Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38804122›Full record

ArticleActa odontologica Scandinavica2024

Complications and complaints in craniofacial fractures - Finnish national data for 20 years.

Inka Luotamo, Johanna Snäll, Miika Toivari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta odontologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Inka LuotamoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Kotka, Finland; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. inka.luotamo@iki.fi.
Johanna SnällDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Miika ToivariDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResearch on reasons for malpractice claims in oral and maxillofacial surgery is scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the causes and prevalence of permanent harm among craniofacial fracture related malpractice claims. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective register study was designed and implemented. All patients with a complaint and a diagnosis of facial or cranial fracture were included. The main outcome was the presence of permanent harm, and the predictor variable was the cause of complaint. Chi-square test was used for estimation of statistical significance.

resultsDelay in correct diagnosis was the leading cause of malpractice claims (63.2%), and permanent harm was found in 23.1% of the population. 82.4% of injuries were facial fractures in total population. 65.3% (n = 98) of facial trauma were related with delayed diagnostics (p < 0.001). Permanent harm was more frequent in patients with delayed diagnosis (71.4%) than those without (60.7%, p = 0.299).

conclusionsClaims of craniofacial trauma are related with under-diagnostics, and un-diagnosed facial fracture can lead to a high rate of permanent harm. Systematic clinical evaluation and facial trauma specialist consultation is recommended to set early correct diagnosis for and improve treatment of craniofacial trauma patients.

Indexed as

Skull FracturesAdolescentAdultAgedChildFacial BonesFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMalpracticeMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38804122
PMCPMC11302651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.