ArticleHeliyon2024
The accuracy of cup anteversion measurement on postoperative pelvic radiographs: A comparative retrospective cohort study between DDH and non-DDH patients.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relating total hip replacement and acetabular cup positioning with outcome: A systematic review.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based automated measurement of hip key angles and auxiliary diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: Postoperative pelvic radiographs remain a vital tool for assessing cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty (THA), with the accuracy influenced by various factors. The objective of this study is to investigate the accuracy of cup anteversion measurement in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) patients and others based on postoperative pelvic radiographs conducted under the current heavy workload conditions. Materials and methods: Patients who underwent THA at our hospital with both postoperative X-ray and CT images from January 2020 to December 2022 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Virtual X-ray films were generated using digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) technology from CT images, with pelvic position perfectly controlled. Radiographic anteversion (RA) was measured on 3D-CT, virtual X-rays, and actual postoperative X-rays, abbreviated as RA_3D, RA_DRR, and RA_Xray, respectively. A repeated-measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was utilized to evaluate the variations in RA within and between different groups across three methods. The Bland-Altman plot analysis showed the variations among methods in DDH and non-DDH patients, setting a clinically acceptable limits of agreement (LOA) at ±5°. Results: This study included 154 hip cases, with 63 DDH and 91 other diseases. Repeated-measures ANCOVA revealed a descending trend in RA across three methods, with differences of 2.64° (DDH) vs. 2.74° (others) from 3D to DRR, and 4.89° (DDH) vs. 1.07° (others) from DRR to X-ray. The group by methods interaction effect were significant (p = 0.002). Significant statistical differences in RA_Xray (P = 0.035) were observed between DDH and non-DDH patients, but not in RA_3D and RA_DRR. Bland-Altman plots showed 71.4 % of DDH patients exceeded the clinically acceptable LOA, compared to 36.3 % of other patients. Conclusion: Our study indicated that under the current intense workload, the reliability of assessing cup anteversion using postoperative pelvic radiographs is challenged, especially in patients with DDH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.