Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38803940›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Revisiting the symptom iceberg based on the Danish symptom cohort - Symptom experiences and healthcare-seeking behaviour in the general Danish population in 2022.

Lisa Maria Sele Sætre, Isabella Raasthøj, Gitte Bruun Lauridsen, Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam, Peter Haastrup, Sanne Rasmussen, Natasja Eilerskov, Jens Søndergaard, Maria Munch Storsveen, Sonja Wehberg and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Healthcare seeking - who, when and why?Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lisa Maria Sele SætreResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campusej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Isabella RaasthøjResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campusej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Gitte Bruun LauridsenResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campusej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Kirubakaran BalasubramaniamResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campusej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Peter HaastrupResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campusej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Sanne RasmussenResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campusej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Natasja EilerskovResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campusej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Jens SøndergaardResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campusej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Maria Munch StorsveenResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campusej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Sonja WehbergResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campusej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Dorte Ejg JarbølResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campusej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare-seeking behaviour may change over time, and some groups are more likely to avoid relevant help seeking, which possibly contributes to social inequity in health. Thus, we developed an expansion of and follow-up to the Danish Symptom Cohort (DaSC) from 2012 and formed the DaSC II, which encompassed a population-based questionnaire study investigating symptoms and healthcare-seeking behaviour. In this paper, we describe the conceptual framework, development and content validity of the questionnaire and a responder analysis of the participants in the DaSC II. We present the symptom iceberg in the Danish general population by estimating the prevalence of symptoms and proportion of contacts to general practitioners (GPs) in 2022. Moreover, we discuss differences in healthcare-seeking behaviour with reference to the 2012 DaSC. Methods: 100,000 randomly selected Danish citizens aged ≥20 years, along with the 44,713 respondents from the 2012 cohort, were invited to participate in a survey. The questionnaire was pilot and field tested prior to distribution. Descriptive statistics were used to estimate symptom prevalence and proportion of GP contacts, and to execute the respondent analysis. Results: Nine out of ten respondents reported at least one symptom within the preceding four weeks and reported an average of 4.6 symptoms. One in four symptoms were presented to a GP. The highest proportion of GP contacts was found for haematuria (63.3 %) and shortness of breath (51.8 %). For several symptoms, differences between the sexes were found in relation to both prevalence and GP contacts. The proportion of GP contacts was higher in 2022 than in 2012 and was most pronounced for general, frequently experienced symptoms and to a lesser extent for cancer alarm symptoms. Conclusion: Many symptoms go unreported, which may delay relevant diagnosis; more research on certain symptom categories and population subgroups is needed. Future studies based on the DaSC II form a basis for interventions targeting symptom awareness, healthcare-seeking behaviour and social equity in society and health.

Indexed as

General populationHealthcare-seeking behaviourQuestionnaire studySocial inequitySymptom experiences

Identifiers

PMID38803940
PMCPMC11128908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.