Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38803888›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Process and quality evaluation of different improved composts made with a smart laboratory pilot plant.

Roberto Altieri, Riccardo Spaccini, Catello Pane, Gelsomina Manganiello, Silvana Cangemi, Mariavittoria Verrillo, Vitale Stanzione, Alessandro Esposito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roberto AltieriInstitute for Agricultural and Forest Systems in the Mediterranean, National Research Council (CNR-ISAFOM), Perugia, Italy.
Riccardo SpacciniCERMANU - NMR Research Center, University of Napoli Federico II, Portici, Italy.
Catello PaneResearch Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Pontecagnano Faiano, Italy.
Gelsomina ManganielloResearch Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Pontecagnano Faiano, Italy.
Silvana CangemiCERMANU - NMR Research Center, University of Napoli Federico II, Portici, Italy.
Mariavittoria VerrilloCERMANU - NMR Research Center, University of Napoli Federico II, Portici, Italy.
Vitale StanzioneInstitute for Agricultural and Forest Systems in the Mediterranean, National Research Council (CNR-ISAFOM), Perugia, Italy.
Alessandro EspositoInstitute for Agricultural and Forest Systems in the Mediterranean, National Research Council (CNR-ISAFOM), Perugia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study monitored the process and investigated the quality of compost obtained from different biomasses. Five blends of agri-food waste were composted by a laboratory pilot plant named COMPOSTER, that is designed to optimize biodegradation, and produce compost efficiently. The COMPOSTER consists of two 35-liter nearly adiabatic, aerated bioreactors that simulate an industrial process involving the typical sequence of mesophilic-thermophilic-mesophilic phases. It continuously monitors and records temperature, internal pressure, and biomass weight, while controlling and quantifying oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide emissions resulting from aerobic biodegradation. All composts were characterized for their main chemical, physical, and molecular features, as well as their suppressiveness against

Indexed as

13C CPMAS-NMRCompostFusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersiciPyrolysis-GC-MSSuppressiveness

Identifiers

PMID38803888
PMCPMC11128855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.