ArticleHeliyon2024
Heart/breathing rate ratio (HBR) as a predictor of mortality in critically ill patients.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The early prediction of death is a challenge for medical staff. We evaluated the ability of the heart/breathing rate ratio (HBR) to predict mortality. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective observational study of adult patients who had fever with or without respiratory symptoms, who survived at least 2 h after visiting the hospital, and whose lactate levels and vital signs were tested. We evaluated the distribution of mortality at different HBR levels and compared HBR with lactate. Results: A total of 18,872 fever clinic visits were screened, and 183 patients whose lactate levels were tested were recruited. Patients who had HBR values lower than 4·5 or higher than 5·5 had greater mortality than patients who had HBR values between 4·5 and 5·5 (21·3 % vs. 3·4 %, p = 0·003; 28·9 % vs. 3·4 %, p < 0·001, respectively). In patients whose HBR was <5, the AUROC for HBR for mortality was 0·762 (95 % CI: 0.643-0·880), and that for lactate was 0·701 (95 % CI: 0·564-0·837). In patients whose HBR was ≥5, the AUROC for HBR for mortality was 0·721 (95 % CI: 0·584-0·857), and that for lactate was 0·742 (95 % CI: 0·607-0·848). Conclusions: HBR is helpful for stratifying mortality risk among critically ill patients in acute care clinics for infectious diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.