Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38803871›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Application of coal fly ash for trace metal adsorption from wastewater: A review.

Alexis Munyengabe, Maria Banda, Wilma Augustyn, Khathutshelo Netshiongolwe, Denga Ramutshatsha-Makhwedzha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Adsorption of PbEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexis MunyengabeFaculty of Science, Tshwane University of Technology, Department of Chemistry, Pretoria, X0001, South Africa.
Maria BandaFaculty of Science, Tshwane University of Technology, Department of Chemistry, Pretoria, X0001, South Africa.
Wilma AugustynFaculty of Science, Tshwane University of Technology, Department of Chemistry, Pretoria, X0001, South Africa.
Khathutshelo NetshiongolweFaculty of Science, Tshwane University of Technology, Department of Chemistry, Pretoria, X0001, South Africa.
Denga Ramutshatsha-MakhwedzhaFaculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, Tshwane University of Technology, Department of Chemical, Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Pretoria West Campus, Pretoria, X680, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental pollution has become a global issue due to continuing anthropogenic activities that result in the production of enormous amounts of waste and the subsequent release of hazardous trace metals. The increasing levels of trace metals in the environment must be monitored regularly and reduced to prevent contamination of food chain. Numerous conventional technologies that are widely used for the removal of trace metals from environmental matrices have many drawbacks. Currently, the preferred method to remove trace metal ions is the adsorption process, which normally uses adsorbents. This review investigated the applications of coal fly ash (CFA) as a cost-effective adsorbent and the role it plays in the improved properties of nanomaterials that are used for treatment of trace metals in water. The use of CFA and its role in chemical modification processes results to high removal efficiency of trace metals. CFA is a by-product of coal combustion which is available in abundance and therefore its use is not only beneficial in water treatment processes, but also reduce the burden of solid waste disposal.

Indexed as

AdsorbentsCoal fly ashEnvironmental matricesNanomaterials

Identifiers

PMID38803871
PMCPMC11128527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.