Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38803851›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

3D printing for energy optimization of building envelope - Experimental results.

Tullio de Rubeis, Annamaria Ciccozzi, Domenica Paoletti, Dario Ambrosini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tullio de RubeisDepertment of Civil, Construction-Architectural and Environmental Engineering (DICEAA), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Annamaria CiccozziDepartment of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics (DIIIE), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Domenica PaolettiDepartment of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics (DIIIE), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Dario AmbrosiniDepartment of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics (DIIIE), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The building sector is a major contributor to the world's energy consumption, exhibiting an ever-increasing trend. Heat losses through the building envelope constitute the most significant factor. Furthermore, the construction process has seen limited technological advancements in recent years, remaining heavily reliant on manual labor. Additive manufacturing emerges as a promising approach, with applications in the building sector on the rise. However, research on the thermal performance of 3D-printed components remains limited. Despite its recent introduction in the construction industry, 3D printing has yet to attain a level of maturity commensurate with other established methods. This paper aims to reduce this gap by analyzing 3D-printed blocks from a heat transfer perspective. The article introduces two key innovations. Firstly, it explores the design of various internal geometries and air gaps aimed at minimizing heat flux exchange between block surfaces. Secondly, it presents an experimental study conducted with a custom-designed setup tailored for testing 3D printed blocks. The blocks are constructed using recyclable plastic material and feature different internal geometries based on hexagonal cells. While the plan size of the cells remains consistent, their vertical structures vary as follows: 1) Block 1: Hexagonal air cavities without horizontal partitions. 2) Block 2: Hexagonal air cavities with three horizontal partitions, dividing the cells vertically into four parts. 3) Block 3: Honeycomb structure characterized by three horizontal partitions and staggering along the vertical axis. Their performance was experimentally evaluated using the Hot Box method, heat flow meter sensors, and infrared thermography. The results demonstrated reductions of up to 11.5 % in terms of thermal transmittance (U-value) with the inclusion of horizontal partitions. Starting from a U-value of 1.22 ± 0.04 W/m

Indexed as

3D printingEnergy efficiencyExperimental analysisHeat transferHot boxThermal analysis

Identifiers

PMID38803851
PMCPMC11128927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.