ArticleHeliyon2024
Factors correlating to decisions for prescribing pharmacological treatment and referrals in suspected peripheral neuropathy cases in chat consultation-based application.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Since the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been increasing use ofchat-based telemedicine, including for patients with neuropathy complaints. It is imperative to learn how to effectively use telemedicine. This study describes the characteristics of patients with neuropathy complaints in chat-based telemedicine services in Indonesia and their influence on treatment decisions and referrals. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study during the COVID-19 pandemic era (March 2020 to December 2021) using anonymous secondary data from patient chat databases on Indonesian application-based telemedicine services (Halodoc, Alodokter, Good Doctor, and Milvik). We applied bivariate and multivariate analysis. Results: We obtained 1051 patients with suspected peripheral nerve complaints (4 per 10,000) from a total of 2,199,527 user consultations, with the majority being 40-64 years old females and diabetes mellitus was the leading comorbid (90.7%). Most patients received treatment (90.7%) and only 11.4% patients were referred. Multivariate analysis showed that treatment was more likely to be given by a neurologist (p < 0.01). Chronic symptoms (p < 0.01) and previous laboratory/other tests (p = 0.01) decreased the likelihood of medication prescription. Referrals were more likely to be given to chronic onset (p = 0.02), hypertension and heart disease (p < 0.01), and previous laboratory/other tests (p = 0.02). The opposite was true for age≥65 years, female (p = 0.04), and neurologists or other specialists as responders (p < 0.01). Conclusion: We identified several factors that influence the treatment decision such as female patients and onset. Meanwhile, age, sex, chronic symptoms, history of hypertension and heart disease, and previous laboratory/other tests may influence the referral decisions. General practitioners were more likely to refer the patients whereas neurologists or other specialists were more likely to give treatment. Chat-based telemedicine services can still be developed in the future to be better.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.