Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38803846›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024

Biomechanical analysis of a new cannulated screw for unstable femoral neck fractures.

Zhigang Chen, Feiyang Chen, Xinbao Xu, Xin Li, Haidong Cui, Wen Zhang, Dong Jiang, Feixiang Zhang, Yinbing Chen, Shiran Zhou and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhigang Chen *Department of Orthopaedics, Hai'an People's Hospital, Hai'an, Jiangsu, China.
Feiyang Chen *Medical School, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xinbao XuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hai'an People's Hospital, Hai'an, Jiangsu, China.
Xin LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hai'an People's Hospital, Hai'an, Jiangsu, China.
Haidong CuiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hai'an People's Hospital, Hai'an, Jiangsu, China.
Wen ZhangInstitute of Orthopaedics, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Dong JiangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hai'an People's Hospital, Hai'an, Jiangsu, China.
Feixiang ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hai'an People's Hospital, Hai'an, Jiangsu, China.
Yinbing ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hai'an People's Hospital, Hai'an, Jiangsu, China.
Shiran ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hai'an People's Hospital, Hai'an, Jiangsu, China.
Shujun LyuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hai'an People's Hospital, Hai'an, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures (FNFs) remains a challenge. In this study, a new cannulated screw for unstable FNFs was designed to provide a new approach for the clinical treatment of these injuries, and its biomechanical stability was analyzed using finite element analysis and mechanical tests. Methods: An unstable FNF model was established. An internal fixation model with parallel inverted triangular cannulated screws (CSs) and a configuration with two superior cannulated screws and one inferior new cannulated screw (NCS) were used. The biomechanical properties of the two fixation methods were compared and analyzed by using finite element analysis and mechanical tests. Results: The NCS model outperformed the CSs model in terms of strain and stress distribution in computer-simulated reconstruction of the inverted triangular cannulated screw fixation model for unstable FNFs. In the biomechanical test, the NCS group showed significantly smaller average femoral deformation (1.08 ± 0.15 mm vs. 1.50 ± 0.37 mm) and fracture line displacement (1.43 ± 0.30 mm vs. 2.01 ± 0.47 mm). In the NCS group, the mean stiffness was significantly higher than that in the CSs group (729.37 ± 82.20 N/mm vs. 544.83 ± 116.07 N/mm), and the mean compression distance was significantly lower than that in the CSs group (2.87 ± 0.30 mm vs. 4.04 ± 1.09 mm). Conclusion: The NCS combined with two ordinary cannulated screws in an inverted triangle structure to fix unstable FNFs can provide better biomechanical stability than CSs and exhibit a length- and angle-stable construct to prevent significant femoral neck shortening.

Indexed as

biomechanicsfinite element analysisinternal fixationnew cannulated screwunstable femoral neck fracture

Identifiers

PMID38803846
PMCPMC11128572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.