ArticleCureus2024
Coordinating Qualitative Predictor Variables in an Applied Linear Model: Analysis and Application for Applied Sciences.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background In applied sciences, statistical models are pivotal for uncovering relationships in complex datasets. The applied linear model establishes associative links between variables. While qualitative predictors are essential, their integration into linear models poses challenges. The dummy variable approach transforms qualitative variables into binary ones for regression analysis. Multilayer Feedforward Neural Networks (MLFFNN) offer validation of regression models, and fuzzy regression offers alternative methods to address the ambiguity of qualitative predictors. This study aims to enhance the integration of qualitative predictors in applied linear models through statistical methodologies. Material and methods This study design involves the transformation of qualitative predictors into dummy variables, the bootstrapping technique to improve the parameter estimates, the Multilayer Feedforward Neural Network, and fuzzy regression. This study uses the programming language R as an analysis tool. Results The multiple linear regression model demonstrates precision and a significant fit (p<0.05), with an R-squared value of 0.95 and mean square error (MSE) of 9.97. Comparing actual and predicted values, fuzzy regression exhibits superior predictability over linear regression. The MLFFNN yields a reduced MSE net of 0.362, indicating enhanced prediction precision for derived models. Conclusion This study presents a precise methodology for integrating qualitative variables into linear regression, supported by the combination of specific statistical methodologies to enhance predictive modeling. By integrating fuzzy linear regression, MLFF neural networks, and bootstrapping, the proposed technique emerges as the most effective approach for modeling and prediction. These findings underscore the efficacy of this method in seamlessly integrating qualitative variables into linear models, ultimately enhancing accuracy and prediction capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.