Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38803676›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

The validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the biological rhythms interview of assessment in neuropsychiatry in the community: a large Chinese college student population.

Hebin Huang, Xinhe Tian, Bess Yin-Hung Lam, Weicong Lu, Xiaoyue Li, Shuixiu He, Xingjian Xu, Ruoxi Zhang, Runhua Wang, Danpin Li and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Hebin HuangDepartment of Affective Disorder, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xinhe TianDepartment of Affective Disorder, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Bess Yin-Hung LamDepartment of Counselling and Psychology, Hong Kong Shue Yan University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Weicong LuDepartment of Affective Disorder, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoyue LiDepartment of Affective Disorder, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shuixiu HeDepartment of Affective Disorder, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xingjian XuDepartment of Affective Disorder, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ruoxi ZhangDepartment of Affective Disorder, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Runhua WangDepartment of Affective Disorder, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Danpin LiDepartment of Affective Disorder, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yanling GaoDepartment of Affective Disorder, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ningning ChenDepartment of Affective Disorder, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shiyun WuDepartment of Affective Disorder, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Guiyun XuDepartment of Affective Disorder, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Kangguang LinDepartment of Affective Disorder, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To test the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the biological rhythms interview of assessment in neuropsychiatry (C-BRIAN) in a group of young adults with and without depressive symptoms. Methods: Three hundred and seventy-eight university students were recruited as participants. Based on the scores from Center for Epidemiological Survey Depression Scale (CES-D), students were divided into the depressed group and healthy group. Explorative factor analysis was applied to assess the construct validity of the C-BRIAN. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and CES-D were compared with the C-BRIAN to test the convergent validity. The internal consistency of the C-BRIAN was also examined. Results: Three factors were extracted (activities, eating patterns, and sleep factors) explaining 63.9% of the total variance. The internal consistencies were very good with a coefficient of 0.94 (overall) and 0.89-0.91 for three factors. The domains of activities, eating patterns, and sleep were moderately correlated with PSQI ( Conclusion: Our findings suggest that C-BRIAN has good validity and reliability which can be used to assess the biological rhythm in the young adult population with depressive symptoms. C-BRIAN would be a reliable tool to detect depressive symptoms for timely prevention and intervention in the community.

Indexed as

biological rhythmC-BRIANdepressive symptomsself-report questionnairevalidation

Identifiers

PMID38803676
PMCPMC11129656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.