Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38803578›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Evaluation of a cadaveric wrist motion simulator using marker-based X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology.

Joanna Glanville, Karl T Bates, Daniel Brown, Daniel Potts, John Curran, Sebastiano Fichera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joanna GlanvilleSchool of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.
Karl T BatesDepartment of Musculoskeletal & Ageing Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.
Daniel BrownLiverpool Orthopaedic and Trauma Service, Liverpool University Hospitals, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.
Daniel PottsSchool of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.
John CurranSchool of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.
Sebastiano FicheraSchool of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom.

Funding

Engineering & Physical Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council (MRC) MR/P020941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical intervention is a common option for the treatment of wrist joint arthritis and traumatic wrist injury. Whether this surgery is arthrodesis or a motion preserving procedure such as arthroplasty, wrist joint biomechanics are inevitably altered. To evaluate effects of surgery on parameters such as range of motion, efficiency and carpal kinematics, repeatable and controlled motion of cadaveric specimens is required. This study describes the development of a device that enables cadaveric wrist motion to be simulated before and after motion preserving surgery in a highly controlled manner. The simulator achieves joint motion through the application of predetermined displacements to the five major tendons of the wrist, and records tendon forces. A pilot experiment using six wrists aimed to evaluate its accuracy and reproducibility. Biplanar X-ray videoradiography (BPVR) and X-Ray Reconstruction of Moving Morphology (XROMM) were used to measure overall wrist angles before and after total wrist arthroplasty. The simulator was able to produce flexion, extension, radioulnar deviation, dart thrower's motion and circumduction within previously reported functional ranges of motion. Pre- and post-surgical wrist angles did not significantly differ. Intra-specimen motion trials were repeatable; root mean square errors between individual trials and average wrist angle and tendon force profiles were below 1° and 2 N respectively. Inter-specimen variation was higher, likely due to anatomical variation and lack of wrist position feedback. In conclusion, combining repeatable intra-specimen cadaveric motion simulation with BPVR and XROMM can be used to determine potential effects of motion preserving surgeries on wrist range of motion and biomechanics.

Indexed as

CadaverRange of Motion, ArticularWrist JointAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsTendonsBiplanar X-Ray videoradiographyCadaveric wrist motion simulationMarker-based XROMMTotal wrist arthroplastyWrist biomechanics

Identifiers

PMID38803578
PMCPMC11129696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.