ArticleNature and science of sleep2024
Association of Sleep Pattern and Genetic Susceptibility with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Prospective Analysis of the UK Biobank.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The mediation effect of sleep quality on the association between ambient air pollution and type 2 diabetes among UK adults: a population-based cohort study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Big data approaches for novel mechanistic insights on sleep and circadian rhythms: a workshop summary.Sleep · 2025Article
- Prevalence and Factors Associated with Rapid Eye Movement-Related Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients with Narcolepsy.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is high worldwide. This study aimed to quantify the relationship between the incidence of OSA and sleep patterns and genetic susceptibility. Methods: A total of 355,133 white British participants enrolled in the UK Biobank between 2006 and 2010 with follow-up data until September 2021 were recruited. We evaluated sleep patterns using a customized sleep scoring method based on the low-risk sleep phenotype, defined as follows: morning chronotype, 7-8 hours of sleep per day, never/rarely experience insomnia, no snoring, no frequent daytime sleepiness, never/rarely nap, and easily getting up early. The polygenic risk score was calculated to assess genetic susceptibility to OSA. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the associations between OSA and sleep patterns and genetic susceptibility. Results: During a mean follow-up of 12.57 years, 4618 participants were diagnosed with OSA (age: 56.83 ± 7.69 years, women: 31.3%). Compared with those with a poor sleep pattern, participants with a normal (HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.38-0.46), ideal (HR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.19-0.24), or optimal (HR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.12-0.18) sleep pattern were significantly more likely to have OSA. The genetic susceptibility of 173,239 participants was calculated, and the results showed that poor (HR: 3.67, 95% CI: 2.95-4.57) and normal (HR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.66-2.16) sleep patterns with high genetic susceptibility can increase the risk for OSA. Conclusion: This large-scale prospective study provides evidence suggesting that sleep patterns across seven low-risk sleep phenotypes may protect against OSA in individuals with varying degrees of genetic susceptibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.