ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
A novel nomogram and prognostic factor for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma survival.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study represented the inaugural effort to develop predictive survival nomograms for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (mSTS) patients in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Method: From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database, we extracted 3078 eligible patients with mSTS between 2016 and 2022. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, univariate and multivariable Cox analyses, and univariate and multivariable logistic analyses were conducted. Subsequently, predictive nomograms were constructed. Clinical effectiveness was validated using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) methods. Results: We used the SEER database to include 3078 eligible patients with mSTS between 2016 and 2022. All the eligible patients were randomly allocated in a ratio of 6:4 and stratified into a training group (n = 1846) and a validation group (n = 1232). In the multivariate Cox analysis, age, race, marital status, pathological grade, histologic subtype, surgery, and chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factors. These factors were used to construct the nomogram to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of mSTS patients. The C-index for the training cohort and the validation cohort was 0.722(95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.708-0.736), and 0.716(95% CI: 0.698-0.734), respectively. The calibration curves for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS probability demonstrated excellent calibration between the predicted and the actual survival. The AUC values of the nomogram at 1-, 3-, and 5-year were 0.785, 0.767, and 0.757 in the training cohort, 0.773, 0.754, and 0.751 in the validation cohort, respectively. Furthermore, DCA indicated the favorable clinical utility of the nomogram in both cohorts. The risk stratification system was constructed using the established nomogram, which enhanced prediction accuracy, aided clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and informing treatment decisions. Conclusion: This study marked the inaugural effort in constructing predictive survival nomograms mSTS patients in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The robustly constructed nomograms, alongside actual outcomes, offered valuable insights to inform follow-up management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.