Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38803460›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2024

The olfactory diary: Tracking awareness and consciousness of the sense of smell throughout the day.

David T Liu, Gerold Besser, Veronika Moser, Bernhard Prem, Gunjan Sharma, Marie Ehrgott, Bertold Renner, Christian A Mueller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David T LiuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6948-737X
Gerold BesserDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3168-7477
Veronika MoserDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Bernhard PremDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0193-2451
Gunjan SharmaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Marie EhrgottDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Bertold RennerInstitute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg Erlangen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0845-6793
Christian A MuellerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6172-5417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to follow the daily course of patients with olfactory dysfunction and healthy controls and to assess (i) how many times a day, (ii) at which time, and (iii) in which aspect of daily life participants are conscious about their sense of smell. Methods: In this longitudinal study, 49 patients with smell loss and 30 healthy participants were enrolled. Olfactory function was assessed using the Sniffin' Sticks. All participants received paper diaries designed for a 14-day period, featuring 12 rows representing 12 daily hours and six columns for various daily life aspects. They were instructed to mark their awareness of smell by indicating the relevant row and column in the diary. Following the return of the diaries, a second olfactory test was conducted within the patient group. Results: On average, patients were consciously aware of their sense of smell around 8 times daily, while healthy participants noted it about 6.5 times a day. Both groups primarily focused on their sense of smell during activities related to "eating," followed by considerations in "social life" and "personal hygiene." Interestingly, distinct patterns emerged: patients peaked in awareness at 8 a.m. and 7 p.m., whereas healthy individuals showed peaks at 6 a.m., 12 p.m., and 7 p.m. Despite regular diary use, we observed no improvement in patients' olfactory function or related quality of life. Conclusion: The olfactory diary is a valuable tool unveiling individual smell awareness patterns in patients with smell loss, aiding in counseling and patient management. Level of Evidence: 4.

Indexed as

hyposmiaolfactionolfactory diarysmellsmell loss

Identifiers

PMID38803460
PMCPMC11129550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.