Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38803458›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2024

Multimodal diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: State of the art review and emerging concepts.

Sina J Torabi, Arash Abiri, Xinlei Chen, Mehmet Senel, Frank P K Hsu, Andrej Lupták, Michelle Khine, Edward C Kuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sina J TorabiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of California Irvine California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1964-7109
Arash AbiriDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of California Irvine California USA.
Xinlei ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering University of California Irvine California USA.
Mehmet SenelDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences University of California Irvine California USA.
Frank P K HsuDepartment of Neurological Surgery University of California Irvine California USA.
Andrej LuptákDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences University of California Irvine California USA.
Michelle KhineDepartment of Biomedical Engineering University of California Irvine California USA.
Edward C KuanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of California Irvine California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3475-0718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Currently, diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea relies on a multimodal approach, increasing costs and ultimately delaying diagnosis. In the United States and internationally, the crux of such a diagnosis relies on confirmation testing (via biomarkers) and localization (e.g., imaging). Biomarker testing may require analysis at an outside facility, resulting in delays diagnosis and treatment. In addition, specialized imaging may be nonspecific and often requires an active leak for diagnosis. There remains a clear need for innovative new technology. Methods: A comprehensive review was conducted on both foundational and innovative scholarly articles regarding current and emerging diagnosis modalities for CSF. Results: Current modalities in CSF rhinorrhea diagnosis and localization include laboratory tests (namely, B2T immunofixation), imaging (CT and/or MRI) with or without intrathecal administration, and surgical exploration. Each of these modalities carry flaws, risks, and benefits, ultimately contributing to delays in diagnosis and morbidity. Promising emerging technologies include lateral flow immunoassays (LFI) and biologically functionalized field-effect transistors (BioFET). Nevertheless, these carry some drawbacks of their own, and require further validation. Conclusion: CSF rhinorrhea remains a challenging diagnosis, requiring a multimodal approach to differentiate from nonpathologic causes of rhinorrhea. Current methods in diagnosis are imperfect, as the ideal test would be a readily accessible, inexpensive, rapid, highly accurate point-of-care test without the need for excess fluid or specialized processing. Critical work is being done to develop promising, new, improved tests, though a clear successor has not yet emerged. Level of Evidence: N/A.

Indexed as

beta‐2‐tranferrinCSF leakCSF rhinorrheaemerging technologies

Identifiers

PMID38803458
PMCPMC11129547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.