ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Expectant management for umbilical artery thrombosis in the third trimester of pregnancy: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Prenatal Doppler Hemodynamic-Clinical Risk Model for Predicting Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Fetuses with Umbilical Artery Thrombosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Umbilical Artery Thrombosis in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy: A Retrospective Analysis of 13 Cases.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2026Article
- Umbilical Artery Thrombosis Masquerading as Single Umbilical Artery in a Stillbirth.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- From dual to single umbilical artery: a case of umbilical artery thrombosis with hypercoiling and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Umbilical Artery Thrombosis in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Case-based Insight into Doppler Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Perinatal Outcomes.Journal of medical ultrasoundReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Umbilical artery thrombosis (UAT) is a rare complication of pregnancy and is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including fetal intrauterine distress, intrauterine growth restriction, and still birth. UAT is unpredictable, and prenatal diagnosis is challenging. There is no consensus on the treatment strategy of UAT, especially for patients with prenatal detection of one of the umbilical artery embolisms. In most previous cases, an emergency cesarean section was performed, or intrauterine fetal death occurred at the time of UAT diagnosis. Case presentation: In this report, we describe a case of thrombosis in one of the umbilical arteries detected by routine ultrasonography at 31 Conclusions: Based on our experience, obstetricians should comprehensively consider the current gestational age and fetal intrauterine status when UAT is suspected to determine the best delivery time. The appropriate gestational age should be prolonged as long as the mother and fetus are stable when the fetus is immature, trying our best to complete the corticosteroid treatment to promote fetal lung maturity and magnesium sulfate to protect fetal brain. During expectant management, ultrasound monitoring, electronic fetal heart monitoring, and fetal movement counting should be strengthened. Clinicians should ensure that the patients and their families are informed about all potential risks of expectant management for UAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.