ArticleClinical kidney journal2024
[
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tubulointerstitial inflammation in glomerular diseases: mechanistic pathways, prognostic value, and translational therapeutic targets.Renal failure · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Performance of [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- First Experience with [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Multiple metabolic analysis of [Heliyon · 2025Article
- Advancements in the non-invasive diagnosis of renal fibrosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Non-invasive assessment of IgA nephropathy severity with [Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: [ Methods: Twenty-six patients (14 males and 12 females; mean age, 50.5 ± 16.5 years) with a wide range of kidney diseases and 10 patients (six males and four females; mean age, 55.4 ± 8.6 years) without known evidence of renal disease as disease controls underwent [ Results: We found that renal parenchymal FAPI uptake was significantly higher in patients with various kidney diseases than in control patients in this study (SUV Conclusions: [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.