ArticleClinical case reports2024
A case of transanal protrusion of ventriculoperitoneal shunt in an adult patient without any classic symptoms of bowel perforation.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Gut-Brain Axis: A Case Report of Transanal Extrusion of a Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt and Literature Review.Cureus · 2026Article
- Delayed transanal extrusion of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt in an adult patient: A rare delayed gastrointestinal complication following post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- A case of transanal protrusion of ventriculoperitoneal shunt in an adult patient without any classic symptoms of bowel perforation.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Key Clinical Message: This report emphasizes the significance of acknowledging infrequent yet severe complications such as bowel perforation and transanal protrusion post ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) surgery. VPS patients should be observed for atypical indicators and manifestations that could suggest the presence of such complications, even in the lack of traditional clinical signs of peritonitis or bowel perforation. Abstract: Placing an intracranial shunt, may be a reasonable approach to decrease the complications of hydrocephalus and it can be done either simultaneous to cranioplasty or not. Ventriculoperitoneal shunts were first proposed in 1905 and has been used since. Similar to any other procedure, there are different complications to this surgery. Abdominal complications, including peritoneal pseudocysts, intestinal volvulus, protruding in hernial sac or extrusion through vagina, scrotum, umbilicus or gastrointestinal tract, are rare but according to previous studies happen in 5%-47% of cases. Bowel perforation is a rare complication and can happen in 0.01%-0.07% of patients. It's also worth mentioning that only 25% of patients with bowel perforation experience the classic clinical symptoms of peritonitis or bowel perforation. This particular complication should not be overlooked since it can cause a high mortality rate of 15%. Here we present a case of transanal protrusion of ventriculoperitoneal shunt after an asymptomatic bowel perforation, in an adult who has undergone surgery after a traumatic brain injury. The patient has undergone surgery and lastly the shunt was manually removed from anus. He was monitored for 3 days and eventually discharged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.