Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38802977›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2024

Integrating uterine microbiome and metabolome to advance the understanding of the uterine environment in dairy cows with metritis.

S Casaro, J G Prim, T D Gonzalez, F Cunha, R S Bisinotto, R C Chebel, J E P Santos, C D Nelson, S J Jeon, R C Bicalho and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pangenomic and biochemical analyses ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

S CasaroDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
J G PrimDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
T D GonzalezDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
F CunhaDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
R S BisinottoDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
R C ChebelDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
J E P SantosDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
C D NelsonDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
S J JeonDepartment of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, Long Island University, Brookville, NY, USA.
R C BicalhoFERA Diagnostics and Biologicals, College Station, TX, USA.
J P DriverDivision of Animals Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Klibs N GalvãoDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. galvaok@ufl.edu.

Funding

U.S. Department of Agriculture Grant # 2019-67015-29836, Accession No: 1019435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetritis is a prevalent uterine disease that affects the welfare, fertility, and survival of dairy cows. The uterine microbiome from cows that develop metritis and those that remain healthy do not differ from calving until 2 days postpartum, after which there is a dysbiosis of the uterine microbiome characterized by a shift towards opportunistic pathogens such as Fusobacteriota and Bacteroidota. Whether these opportunistic pathogens proliferate and overtake the uterine commensals could be determined by the type of substrates present in the uterus. The objective of this study was to integrate uterine microbiome and metabolome data to advance the understanding of the uterine environment in dairy cows that develop metritis. Holstein cows (n = 104) had uterine fluid collected at calving and at the day of metritis diagnosis. Cows with metritis (n = 52) were paired with cows without metritis (n = 52) based on days after calving. First, the uterine microbiome and metabolome were evaluated individually, and then integrated using network analyses.

resultsThe uterine microbiome did not differ at calving but differed on the day of metritis diagnosis between cows with and without metritis. The uterine metabolome differed both at calving and on the day of metritis diagnosis between cows that did and did not develop metritis. Omics integration was performed between 6 significant bacteria genera and 153 significant metabolites on the day of metritis diagnosis. Integration was not performed at calving because there were no significant differences in the uterine microbiome. A total of 3 bacteria genera (i.e. Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, and Bacteroides) were strongly correlated with 49 metabolites on the day of metritis diagnosis. Seven of the significant metabolites at calving were among the 49 metabolites strongly correlated with opportunistic pathogenic bacteria on the day of metritis diagnosis. The main metabolites have been associated with attenuation of biofilm formation by commensal bacteria, opportunistic pathogenic bacteria overgrowth, tissue damage and inflammation, immune evasion, and immune dysregulation.

conclusionsThe data integration presented herein helps advance the understanding of the uterine environment in dairy cows with metritis. The identified metabolites may provide a competitive advantage to the main uterine pathogens Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas and Bacteroides, and may be promising targets for future interventions aiming to reduce opportunistic pathogenic bacteria growth in the uterus.

Indexed as

Dairy cowsMetabolomeMetritisMicrobiomeMulti-omicsUterine disease

Identifiers

PMID38802977
PMCPMC11131188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.