ArticleCritical care (London, England)2024
A scoping review of machine learning for sepsis prediction- feature engineering strategies and model performance: a step towards explainability.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evaluating Artificial Intelligence for Sepsis Prediction in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.Journal of medical systems · 2026Pooled it
- Wearable Technology and Machine Learning for Prediction of Performance-Based and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Admission APRI and Early Mortality in ICU Patients with Sepsis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Machine learning models predicting extubation success in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Review
- Predictive variables for early detection of sepsis in adults admitted to intensive care units: protocol for a systematic review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Explainable Ensemble Learning for Robust Severity Stratification of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome from Clinical Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Phenotype discovery and mortality prediction in sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction: a deep learning and stratified modeling approach.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Early sepsis prediction using a hybrid LSTM-GAT model: a study on the PhysioNet 2019 dataset.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning for early prediction of sepsis-induced coagulopathy: a multicenter retrospective development and validation study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Challenges in early detection and prognostication of sepsis: new approaches from the emergency department and intensive care unit.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting the 28-day mortality risk in patients with sepsis complicated by acute respiratory failure in the ICU.Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Stratifying mortality risk in hypotension using outcome-oriented clustering of vital sign trajectories.iScience · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Predictive Potential of an AI-Driven Deep Learning Model for Pneumonia-Associated Sepsis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A tri-omics and machine learning framework identifies prognostic biomarkers and metabolic signatures in sepsis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Model for Sepsis Prediction in Prolonged and Chronic Critical Illness: Development and Validation Using Retrospective Real-World ICU Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence- and Machine Learning-Assisted Subphenotyping for Personalized Immunotherapy in Sepsis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical and laboratory parameters associated with bloodstream infections among neonates admitted to a tertiary hospital in Tanzania: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Combining machine learning and physiological network models for sepsis prediction.Frontiers in network physiology · 2026Article
- Progress in sepsis prediction models: from traditional scoring systems to multimodal intelligence and clinical translation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based mortality prediction models for emergency department patients: a comparative analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis, an acute and potentially fatal systemic response to infection, significantly impacts global health by affecting millions annually. Prompt identification of sepsis is vital, as treatment delays lead to increased fatalities through progressive organ dysfunction. While recent studies have delved into leveraging Machine Learning (ML) for predicting sepsis, focusing on aspects such as prognosis, diagnosis, and clinical application, there remains a notable deficiency in the discourse regarding feature engineering. Specifically, the role of feature selection and extraction in enhancing model accuracy has been underexplored.
objectivesThis scoping review aims to fulfill two primary objectives: To identify pivotal features for predicting sepsis across a variety of ML models, providing valuable insights for future model development, and To assess model efficacy through performance metrics including AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity.
resultsThe analysis included 29 studies across diverse clinical settings such as Intensive Care Units (ICU), Emergency Departments, and others, encompassing 1,147,202 patients. The review highlighted the diversity in prediction strategies and timeframes. It was found that feature extraction techniques notably outperformed others in terms of sensitivity and AUROC values, thus indicating their critical role in improving sepsis prediction models.
conclusionKey dynamic indicators, including vital signs and critical laboratory values, are instrumental in the early detection of sepsis. Applying feature selection methods significantly boosts model precision, with models like Random Forest and XG Boost showing promising results. Furthermore, Deep Learning models (DL) reveal unique insights, spotlighting the pivotal role of feature engineering in sepsis prediction, which could greatly benefit clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.