Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38802852›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2024

Comparative effects of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and 9% etidronic acid applied with different irrigant activation techniques on the release of growth factors from dentin: in vitro study.

Arzu Kaya Mumcu, Safa Kurnaz, Gülsen Kiraz, Meliha Koldemir Gündüz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of EDTA Formulations and Activation Methods on Stem Cell Response, Antimicrobial Activity and Dentine Integrity: An In Vitro Study.Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arzu Kaya MumcuDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences University, Kutahya, Türkiye. arzu.kayamumcu@ksbu.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7291-144X
Safa KurnazDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences University, Kutahya, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8079-7536
Gülsen KirazDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences University, Kutahya, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3270-7329
Meliha Koldemir GündüzDepartment of Basic Sciences of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Kutahya Health Sciences University, Kutahya, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0969-6377

Funding

Scientific Research Projects Coordination Center of Kutahya Health Sciences University TSA-2022-106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrowth factors embedded in the extracellular matrix of the dentin play an important role in the migration, proliferation, and differentiation of dental pulp stem cells in regenerative endodontics. In regenerative endodontic treatments, the type of irrigation solution used is crucial for the release of growth factors (GFs) from the dentin matrix. This study evaluated the effectiveness of different irrigant activation techniques (IAT) using two different chelating agents, 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 9% etidronic acid (HEDP), in terms of their GF release.

methodsSeventy-two mandibular premolar teeth were prepared to simulate an open apex. The root fragments were irrigated with 20 ml of 1.5% sodium hypochlorite and 20 ml of saline solution. Eight root fragments were randomly separated for the control group, and the remaining 64 fragments were randomly separated into eight groups based on two different chelating agents (17% EDTA and 9% HEDP) and four different IAT ((conventional needle irrigation (CNI), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), sonic activation with EDDY, and XP-endo Finisher (XPF)). TGF-β1, VEGF-A, BMP-7 and IGF-1 release levels were determined using an ELISA, and statistical analysis was performed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, ANOVA, and the Tukey test (p < .05).

resultsCompared to the control group, the experimental groups showed significantly higher GF release when using EDTA or HEDP. Among the activation groups, the EDDY group triggered the highest GF release, and the CNI group triggered the lowest.

conclusionsIAT with EDTA and HEDP can increase GF release, with EDDY being the most effective IAT method. Using chelating agents with IAT may be beneficial in regenerative endodontic treatments.

Indexed as

Chelating AgentsDentinEdetic AcidEtidronic AcidRoot Canal IrrigantsBicuspidHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsIn Vitro TechniquesRegenerative EndodonticsRoot Canal PreparationChelating AgentsEdetic AcidEtidronic AcidIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsRoot Canal IrrigantsEDDYEthylenediaminetetraacetic acidEtidronic acidGrowth factorsXP-endo Finisher

Identifiers

PMID38802852
PMCPMC11131224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.