ArticleBMC ophthalmology2024
Effect of 4-week preoperative prism adaptation in preventing postoperative residual esotropia.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantification of Gaze-Dependent Corrective Errors With Fresnel Prisms: Implications for Strabismus Management.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of the long-term prism adaptation test over 1 month or more in strabismus surgery for esotropia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreoperative prism adaptation (PPA) simulates postoperative status and possibly can predict postoperative undercorrection before surgery in esotropia. The present study aimed to assess the effect of 4-week PPA in preventing postoperative residual esotropia.
methodsSeventy-five (75) esotropes who had undergone surgery at a single strabismus center were retrospectively enrolled. They included 25 basic, 31 acute comitant, 10 partially accommodative, and 9 recurrent esotropia patients. The preoperative deviation angle, which had been determined using the alternating prism and cover test, was fully corrected with press-on prisms 4 weeks before surgery. If there was an increase of 5 PD or more of esodeviation, the prisms were changed accordingly at 2 weeks. The deviation angle measured at 4 weeks was determined as the surgical target angle. Patients were then divided into increase (≥ 5 PD increase of angle during 4-week PPA) and non-increase groups. Success was defined as either esodeviation of 8 PD or under or exodeviation of 5 PD or under at distance at postoperative 6 months.
resultsThe increase group included 44 patients (58.7%). The mean deviation angle before PPA was 27.4 PD, and after the 4-week PPA, there was an average increase of 9.4 PD. The success rate was 90.9% in the increase group and 96.8% in the non-increase group (p = 0.316). There were no intergroup differences in preoperative clinical characteristics, esotropia types, postoperative deviation angle or postoperative near stereopsis (p > 0.05).
conclusionsThe results of this study indicated a beneficial effect of 4-week PPA in esotropia of various types, specifically by uncovering the hidden esodeviation in the increase group and simulating the postoperative alignment in both the increase and the non-increase groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.