Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38802804›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2024

Association between gut microbiota and anxiety disorders: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study.

Jianbing Li, Changhe Fan, Jiaqi Wang, Bulang Tang, Jiafan Cao, Xianzhe Hu, Xuan Zhao, Caiqin Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Anxiety and peripheral artery disease.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jianbing LiDepartment of Psychiatry, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, 510317, PR China.
Changhe FanDepartment of Psychiatry, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, 510317, PR China.
Jiaqi WangSchool of Pharmacy, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Bulang TangSchool of Pharmacy, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Jiafan CaoSchool of Pharmacy, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Xianzhe HuSchool of Pharmacy, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Xuan ZhaoSchool of Pharmacy, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Caiqin FengDepartment of Psychiatry, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, 510317, PR China. 359245091@qq.com.

Funding

Guangdong Yiyang Health Sciences Foundation JZ2022001-3Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project 202102010115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are many articles reporting that the component of intestinal microbiota implies a link to anxiety disorders (AD), and the brain-gut axis is also a hot topic in current research. However, the specific relevance between gut microbiota and AD is uncertain. We aimed to investigate causal relationship between gut microbiota and AD by using bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR).

methodsGenetic instrumental variable (IV) for the gut microbiota were obtained from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) involving 18,340 participants. Summary data for AD were derived from the GWAS and included 158,565 cases and 300,995 controls. We applied the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method as the main analysis. Cochran's Q values was computed to evaluate the heterogeneity among IVs. Sensitivity analyses including intercept of MR-Egger method and MR-PRESSO analysis were used to test the horizontal pleiotropy.

resultWe discovered 9 potential connections between bacterial traits on genus level and AD. Utilizing the IVW method, we identified 5 bacterial genera that exhibited a direct correlation with the risk of AD: genus Eubacteriumbrachygroup, genus Coprococcus3, genus Enterorhabdus, genus Oxalobacter, genus Ruminiclostridium6. Additionally, we found 4 bacterial genera that exhibited a negative association with AD: genus Blautia, genus Butyricicoccus, genus Erysipelotrichaceae-UCG003 and genus Parasutterella. The associations were confirmed by the sensitivity analyses.

conclusionOur study found a causal relation between parts of the gut microbiota and AD. Further randomized controlled trials are crucial to elucidate the positive effects of probiotics on AD and their particular protection systems.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenome-Wide Association StudyMendelian Randomization AnalysisBrain-Gut AxisHumansAnxiety disordersGut microbiotaMendelian randomizationSingle nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID38802804
PMCPMC11131207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.