Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38802760›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2024

A multisite validation of a two hours antibiotic susceptibility flow cytometry assay directly from positive blood cultures.

C Pina-Vaz, A Silva-Dias, I Martins-Oliveira, R Gomes, B Perez-Viso, S Cruz, A G Rodrigues, A Sarmento, R Cantón

Abstract readValidation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Rapid identification directly from urine using QUICKprep kit.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

C Pina-VazFASTinov SA, UPTEC Science and Technology Campus, Porto, Portugal. cpinavaz@fastinov.com.
A Silva-DiasFASTinov SA, UPTEC Science and Technology Campus, Porto, Portugal.
I Martins-OliveiraFASTinov SA, UPTEC Science and Technology Campus, Porto, Portugal.
R GomesFASTinov SA, UPTEC Science and Technology Campus, Porto, Portugal.
B Perez-VisoServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal and Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
S CruzDivision of Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
A G RodriguesFASTinov SA, UPTEC Science and Technology Campus, Porto, Portugal.
A SarmentoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal.
R CantónServicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal and Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.

Funding

CINTESIS, R&D Unit UIDP/4255/2020HEALTH-UNORTE NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000039iPFIS programme ISCIII-AES-2019/002740 IFI19/00013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is urgently needed to provide safer treatment to counteract antimicrobial resistance. This is critical in septic patients, because resistance increases empiric therapy uncertainty and the risk of a poor outcome. We validate a novel 2h flow cytometry AST assay directly from positive blood cultures (PBC) by using a room temperature stable FASTgramneg and FASTgrampos kits (FASTinov® Porto, Portugal) in three sites: FASTinov (site-1), Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain (site-2) and Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal (site-3). A total of 670 PBC were included: 333 spiked (site-1) and 337 clinical PBC (151 site-2 and 186 site-3): 367 gram-negative and 303 gram-positive. Manufacturer instructions were followed for sample preparation, panel inoculation, incubation (1h/37ºC) and flow cytometry analysis using CytoFlex (Site-1 and -2) or DxFlex (site-3) both instruments from Beckman-Coulter, USA.

resultsA proprietary software (bioFAST) was used to immediately generate a susceptibility report in less than 2 h. In parallel, samples were processed according to reference AST methods (disk diffusion and/or microdilution) and interpreted with EUCAST and CLSI criteria. Additionally, ten samples were spiked in all sites for inter-laboratory reproducibility. Sensitivity and specificity were >95% for all antimicrobials. Reproducibility was 96.8%/95.0% for FASTgramneg and 95.1%/95.1% for FASTgrampos regarding EUCAST/CLSI criteria, respectively.

conclusionFASTinov® kits consistently provide ultra-rapid AST in 2h with high accuracy and reproducibility on both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. This technology creates a new paradigm in bacterial infection management and holds the potential to significantly impact septic patient outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBlood CultureFlow CytometryMicrobial Sensitivity TestsGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansPortugalReproducibility of ResultsSpainTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial resistanceBlood culturesBloodstream infectionsFlow cytometryRapid antimicrobial susceptibility test

Identifiers

PMID38802760
PMCPMC11131321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.