ArticleAdvances in therapy2024
Efficacy of Cooled-Radiofrequency Ablation of the Genicular Nerve as Treatment for Chronic Knee Pain: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intercostal Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation: A Comprehensive Review of Evolving Techniques and Clinical Applications.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Increasing Denials of Genicular Nerve Procedures Threaten Post-TKA Pain Management and May Drive Opioid Utilization.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Patient reported outcomes following genicular nerve radio frequency ablation for osteoarthritis-related knee pain.Pain management · 2025Article
- Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Meralgia Paresthetica: A Description of a Novel Technique.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Radiofrequency Ablation and Pulsed Radiofrequency of Suprascapular Nerves for Managing Chronic Shoulder Pain.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Thoracic Medial Branches for the Treatment of Chronic Thoracic Pain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Repeat Genicular Nerve Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation: Retained Efficacy or Diminishing Returns?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Lumbar Nerves as Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain.Pain and therapy · 2025Article
- Genicular Nerve Ultrasound-Guided Cryoanalgesia for the Treatment of Chronic Knee Joint Pain: An Observational Retrospective Study.Pain and therapy · 2025Article
- Letter to the Editor Regarding "Efficacy of Cooled-Radiofrequency Ablation of the Genicular Nerve as Treatment for Chronic Knee Pain: A Retrospective Study".Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Knee Joint Pain Using a V-Shaped Active Tip Needle: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Short-Term Effects of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation on Walking Ability in Japanese Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Ultrasonography- and Fluoroscopy-Guided Technique for Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of the Genicular Nerves for Knee Joint Pain.Ochsner journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChronic pain is one of the leading causes of reduced quality of life in the USA, with knee pain commonly reported. Multiple therapeutic modalities are traditionally utilized for pain management; however, some patients may have pain refractory to these techniques. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (c-RFA) of the geniculate nerve is a growing and promising therapy offering a potentially long-term solution to chronic knee pain.
methodsThis study assessed the efficacy, average duration of relief, and potential adverse events using a retrospective chart review of 406 procedures. A two-tailed paired t test was used to assess the statistical significance between pre-RFA vs. post-RFA visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores self-reported by patients. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to evaluate for statistical differences in pre-RFA pain scores and post-RFA pain scores among the categories of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and diagnosis group.
resultsThe mean percent in pain improvement calculated was 65.5% with an average duration of relief of 7.20 months. The average pre-RFA pain score on the VAS was 6.26 out of 10 and 2.59 out of 10 post-RFA. The ANOVA post-RFA pain scores demonstrated statistically significant differences among the categories of age and sex. A total of 54 adverse events were reported, including worsening pain, numbness, paresthesia, and knee swelling.
conclusionThe study demonstrated that c-RFA can potentially be utilized as an alternative safe therapy for chronic knee pain, providing pain relief with a relatively prolonged duration. Inherent challenges of retrospective studies remain a part of the limitations of this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38802633What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.