ArticleScientific reports2024
Multiphase comparative study for WHO/ISUP nuclear grading diagnostic model based on enhanced CT images of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Performance of Machine Learning Models Based on Medical Imaging in Predicting Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in the radiologic diagnosis of major urological cancers: a meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- An interpretable machine learning model based on habitat radiomics combined with deep learning for predicting the WHO/ISUP grade of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- A multicenter study on preoperative WHO/ISUP grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using triphasic contrast-enhanced CT-based habitat imaging.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Computer vision assisted deep transfer learning model for accurate grading of renal cell carcinoma from kidney histopathology images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-based multimodal prediction for nuclear grading status and prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter cohort study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Article
- Deep learning and radiomics-driven algorithm for automated identification of May-Thurner syndrome in Iliac CTV imaging.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The value of radiomics based on 2-[18 F]FDG PET/CT in predicting WHO/ISUP grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.EJNMMI research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To compare and analyze the diagnostic value of different enhancement stages in distinguishing low and high nuclear grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) based on enhanced computed tomography (CT) images by building machine learning classifiers. A total of 51 patients (Dateset1, including 41 low-grade and 10 high-grade) and 27 patients (Independent Dateset2, including 16 low-grade and 11 high-grade) with pathologically proven ccRCC were enrolled in this retrospective study. Radiomic features were extracted from the corticomedullary phase (CMP), nephrographic phase (NP), and excretory phase (EP) CT images, and selected using the recursive feature elimination cross-validation (RFECV) algorithm, the group differences were assessed using T-test and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. The support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), VGG11, ResNet18, and GoogLeNet classifiers are established to distinguish low-grade and high-grade ccRCC. The classifiers based on CT images of NP (Dateset1, RF: AUC = 0.82 ± 0.05, ResNet18: AUC = 0.81 ± 0.02; Dateset2, XGB: AUC = 0.95 ± 0.02, ResNet18: AUC = 0.87 ± 0.07) obtained the best performance and robustness in distinguishing low-grade and high-grade ccRCC, while the EP-based classifier performance in poorer results. The CT images of enhanced phase NP had the best performance in diagnosing low and high nuclear grade ccRCC. Firstorder_Kurtosis and firstorder_90Percentile feature play a vital role in the classification task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.