ArticleScientific reports2024
Novel gene-specific Bayesian Gaussian mixture model to predict the missense variants pathogenicity of Sanfilippo syndrome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical, biochemical, and molecular characterization of a cohort of Egyptian patients with Sanfilippo B syndrome (MPS IIIB): Bayesian Gaussian mixture model.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Genetic Heterogeneity in Four Probands RevealsBiomedicines · 2024Article
- Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIE: A Real Human Disease or a Diagnostic Pitfall?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MPS III is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disease caused mainly by missense variants in the NAGLU, GNS, HGSNAT, and SGSH genes. The pathogenicity interpretation of missense variants is still challenging. We aimed to develop unsupervised clustering-based pathogenicity predictor scores using extracted features from eight in silico predictors to predict the impact of novel missense variants of Sanfilippo syndrome. The model was trained on a dataset consisting of 415 uncertain significant (VUS) missense NAGLU variants. Performance The SanfilippoPred tool was evaluated by validation and test datasets consisting of 197-labelled NAGLU missense variants, and its performance was compared versus individual pathogenicity predictors using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Moreover, we tested the SanfilippoPred tool using extra-labelled 427 missense variants to assess its specificity and sensitivity threshold. Application of the trained machine learning (ML) model on the test dataset of labelled NAGLU missense variants showed that SanfilippoPred has an accuracy of 0.93 (0.86-0.97 at CI 95%), sensitivity of 0.93, and specificity of 0.92. The comparative performance of the SanfilippoPred showed better performance (AUC = 0.908) than the individual predictors SIFT (AUC = 0.756), Polyphen-2 (AUC = 0.788), CADD (AUC = 0.568), REVEL (AUC = 0.548), MetaLR (AUC = 0.751), and AlphMissense (AUC = 0.885). Using high-confidence labelled NAGLU variants, showed that SanfilippoPred has an 85.7% sensitivity threshold. The poor correlation between the Sanfilippo syndrome phenotype and genotype represents a demand for a new tool to classify its missense variants. This study provides a significant tool for preventing the misinterpretation of missense variants of the Sanfilippo syndrome-relevant genes. Finally, it seems that ML-based pathogenicity predictors and Sanfilippo syndrome-specific prediction tools could be feasible and efficient pathogenicity predictors in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.