Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38802520›Full record

ArticleNature methods2024

Dissecting cell membrane tension dynamics and its effect on Piezo1-mediated cellular mechanosensitivity using force-controlled nanopipettes.

Ines Lüchtefeld, Igor V Pivkin, Lucia Gardini, Elaheh Zare-Eelanjegh, Christoph Gäbelein, Stephan J Ihle, Andreas M Reichmuth, Marco Capitanio, Boris Martinac, Tomaso Zambelli and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Biosensing With Nanofluidics.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Directed migration of cancer cells: a systems biophysics perspective.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ines LüchtefeldLaboratory for Biosensors and Bioelectronics, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland. lines@ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4171-7548
Igor V PivkinInstitute of Computing, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland. igor.pivkin@usi.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9593-5217
Lucia GardiniNational Institute of Optics, National Research Council, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0923-9221
Elaheh Zare-EelanjeghLaboratory for Biosensors and Bioelectronics, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1485-2553
Christoph GäbeleinInstitute of Microbiology, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2660-0082
Stephan J IhleLaboratory for Biosensors and Bioelectronics, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas M ReichmuthLaboratory for Biosensors and Bioelectronics, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marco CapitanioEuropean Laboratory for Non-Linear Spectroscopy, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9799-9353
Boris MartinacVictor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8422-7082
Tomaso ZambelliLaboratory for Biosensors and Bioelectronics, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland. ztomaso@ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0965-0950
Massimo VassalliJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. massimo.vassalli@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3063-4376

Funding

Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1135974EC | Eurostars E!11644 SOULEC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 871124 Laserlab-EuropeSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 205321_173020Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) Sinergia CRSII5_202301/1Volkswagen Foundation (VolkswagenStiftung) Initiative
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamics of cellular membrane tension and its role in mechanosensing, which is the ability of cells to respond to physical stimuli, remain incompletely understood, mainly due to the lack of appropriate tools. Here, we report a force-controlled nanopipette-based method that combines fluidic force microscopy with fluorescence imaging for precise manipulation of the cellular membrane tension while monitoring the impact on single-cell mechanosensitivity. The force-controlled nanopipette enables control of the indentation force imposed on the cell cortex as well as of the aspiration pressure applied to the plasma membrane. We show that this setup can be used to concurrently monitor the activation of Piezo1 mechanosensitive ion channels via calcium imaging. Moreover, the spatiotemporal behavior of the tension propagation is assessed with the fluorescent membrane tension probe Flipper-TR, and further dissected using molecular dynamics modeling. Finally, we demonstrate that aspiration and indentation act independently on the cellular mechanobiological machinery, that indentation induces a local pre-tension in the membrane, and that membrane tension stays confined by links to the cytoskeleton.

Indexed as

Cell MembraneIon ChannelsMechanotransduction, CellularAnimalsCalciumHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationCalciumIon ChannelsPIEZO1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID38802520
PMCPMC11166569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.