Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38802446›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Histogram analysis comparison of readout-segmented and single-shot echo-planar imaging for differentiating luminal from non-luminal breast cancer.

Yiqi Hu, Qilan Hu, Zhiqiang Liu, Cicheng Huang, Liming Xia

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yiqi Hu *Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Qilan Hu *Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Zhiqiang LiuDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Cicheng HuangCenter of Stomatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China. huanggua3389@163.com.
Liming XiaDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China. xialiming2017@outlook.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare diffusion-kurtosis imaging (DKI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) parameters of single-shot echo-planar imaging (ss-EPI) and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI) in the differentiation of luminal vs. non-luminal breast cancer using histogram analysis. One hundred and sixty women with 111 luminal and 49 non-luminal breast lesions were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent ss-EPI and rs-EPI sequences on a 3.0T scanner. Histogram metrics were derived from mean kurtosis (MK), mean diffusion (MD) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps of two DWI sequences respectively. Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test was performed for differentiating luminal subtype from non-luminal subtype. The ROC curves were plotted for evaluating the diagnostic performances of significant histogram metrics in differentiating luminal from non-luminal BC. The histogram metrics MK

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEcho-Planar ImagingAdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMiddle AgedROC CurveLuminalMagnetic resonance imagingNon-luminalRs-EPISs-EPI

Identifiers

PMID38802446
PMCPMC11130195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.