Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38802361›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Proteomic analysis of the urothelial cancer landscape.

Franz F Dressler, Falk Diedrichs, Deema Sabtan, Sofie Hinrichs, Christoph Krisp, Timo Gemoll, Martin Hennig, Paulina Mackedanz, Mareile Schlotfeldt, Hannah Voß and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. EpCAM tumor specificity and proteoform patterns in urothelial cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Franz F DresslerInstitute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany. franz-friedrich.dressler@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0873-5805
Falk DiedrichsInstitute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4504-6016
Deema SabtanInstitute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Sofie HinrichsInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Christoph KrispSection Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Campus Forschung N27 00.008, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4689-1967
Timo GemollSection for Translational Surgical Oncology and Biobanking, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Martin HennigDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Paulina MackedanzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Mareile SchlotfeldtInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4727-6374
Hannah VoßSection Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Campus Forschung N27 00.008, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Anne OffermannInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Jutta KirfelInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Marie C RoeschDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Julian P StruckDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Mario W KramerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Axel S MerseburgerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Christian GratzkeDepartment of Urology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Dominik S SchoebDepartment of Urology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Arkadiusz MiernikDepartment of Urology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5894-9647
Hartmut SchlüterSection Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Campus Forschung N27 00.008, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9358-7036
Ulrich WetterauerDepartment of Urology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Roman ZubarevDivision of Chemistry I, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9839-2089
Sven PernerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Philipp WolfDepartment of Urology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6779-4325
Ákos VégváriDivision of Chemistry I, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1287-0906

Funding

Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (Else Kroner-Fresenius Foundation) 2018_A84
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urothelial bladder cancer (UC) has a wide tumor biological spectrum with challenging prognostic stratification and relevant therapy-associated morbidity. Most molecular classifications relate only indirectly to the therapeutically relevant protein level. We improve the pre-analytics of clinical samples for proteome analyses and characterize a cohort of 434 samples with 242 tumors and 192 paired normal mucosae covering the full range of UC. We evaluate sample-wise tumor specificity and rank biomarkers by target relevance. We identify robust proteomic subtypes with prognostic information independent from histopathological groups. In silico drug prediction suggests efficacy of several compounds hitherto not in clinical use. Both in silico and in vitro data indicate predictive value of the proteomic clusters for these drugs. We underline that proteomics is relevant for personalized oncology and provide abundance and tumor specificity data for a large part of the UC proteome ( www.cancerproteins.org ).

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorProteomicsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProteomeUrotheliumBiomarkers, TumorProteome

Identifiers

PMID38802361
PMCPMC11130393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.