ArticleBMJ open2024
Knowledge, attitudes and practice on sudden infant death: study protocol of a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is the unexpected death of an infant less than 1 year old, which occurs without presentation of any signs of mortality risk and it is not explained even after investigation, necropsy and review of the site of death. The nurse is an essential healthcare professional working with children and families who can contribute to preventing avoidable deaths of infants. Because SIDS is preventable, permanent education of the healthcare team, family members and infant caregivers is necessary.
objectiveTo explore the scientific literature about knowledge, attitudes and practice on SIDS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A scoping review will be conducted. Quantitative or qualitative primary studies, theses, dissertations and technical and governmental documents in English, Spanish, French or Portuguese will be considered, without a time limit for selection with search, in the databases: Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Virtual Health Library, Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of the Brazilian Institute and Cochrane. A search strategy will be elaborated with the keywords in the following themes: knowledge, attitudes, practice, sudden infant death and healthcare. The eligibility criteria will be applied to references of selected articles to identify new studies. The studies selected will be subjected to thematic content analysis, which allows data interpretation through a systematic classification process for coding themes to the analysis of quantitative and qualitative studies and meta-aggregation. NVIVO V.14 software will be used to organise, code and validate the data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required. The results will be disseminated to the health science community through professional networks, conference presentations and publication in a scientific journal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.