Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38802167›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2024

Impact of NICE clinical guidelines for prevention and treatment of neonatal infections on antibiotic use in very preterm infants in England and Wales: an interrupted time series analysis.

Mike Saunders, Shalini Ojha, Lisa Szatkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mike SaundersUniversity of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9109-6164
Shalini OjhaCentre for Perinatal Research, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5668-4227
Lisa SzatkowskiCentre for Perinatal Research, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK Lisa.Szatkowski@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3295-5891

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the impact of publication of UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines on the prevention and treatment of early-onset infections (EOIs) in neonates (clinical guideline 149 (CG149), published in 2012, and its 2021 update (NG195) on antibiotic use in very preterm infants.

designInterrupted time series analysis using data from the National Neonatal Research Database.

settingNeonatal units in England and Wales.

participantsInfants born at 22-31 weeks' gestation from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2022 and survived to discharge.

interventionsPublication of CG149 (August 2012) and NG195 (April 2021).

main outcome measuresMeasures of antibiotic use, aggregated by month of birth: antibiotic use rate (AUR), the proportion of care days in receipt of at least one antibiotic; percentage of infants who received ≥1 day of antibiotics on days 1-3 for EOI and after day 3 for late-onset infection (LOI); percentage who received ≥1 prolonged antibiotic course ≥5 days for EOI and LOI.

results96% of infants received an antibiotic during inpatient stay. AUR declined at publication of CG149, without further impact at NG195 publication. There was no impact of CG149 on the underlying trend in infants receiving ≥1 day antibiotics for EOI or LOI, but post-NG195 the monthly trend began to decline for EOI (-0.20%, -0.26 to -0.14) and LOI (-0.23%, -0.33 to -0.12). Use of prolonged antibiotic courses for EOI and LOI declined at publication of CG149 and for LOI this trend accelerated post-NG195.

conclusionsPublications of NICE guidance were associated with reductions in antibiotic use; however neonatal antibiotic exposure remains extremely high.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsInterrupted Time Series AnalysisPractice Guidelines as TopicEnglandFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesWalesAnti-Bacterial AgentsEpidemiologyNeonatology

Identifiers

PMID38802167
PMCPMC11672067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.