Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38801628›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2024

Ethical Stakes for Past, Present, and Prospective Tuberculosis Isolate Research Towards a Multicultural Data Sovereignty Model for Isolate Samples in Research.

A Anderson, M Meher, Z Maroof, S Malua, C Tahapeehi, J Littleton, V Arcus, J Wade, J Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A AndersonTe Kupenga Hauora Māori, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. a.anderson@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0003-0898-5070
M MeherSchool of Social Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland CBD, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
Z MaroofSchool of Social Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland CBD, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
S MaluaSchool of Social Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland CBD, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
C TahapeehiSchool of Social Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland CBD, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
J LittletonSchool of Social Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland CBD, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
V ArcusThe University of Waikato, Knighton Road, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
J WadeSchool of Social Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland CBD, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
J ParkSchool of Social Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland CBD, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.

Funding

Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust 4183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is a potentially fatal infectious disease that, in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ), inequitably affects Asian, Pacific, Middle Eastern, Latin American, and African (MELAA), and Māori people. Medical research involving genome sequencing of TB samples enables more nuanced understanding of disease strains and their transmission. This could inform highly specific health interventions. However, the collection and management of TB isolate samples for research are currently informed by monocultural biomedical models often lacking key ethical considerations. Drawing on a qualitative kaupapa Māori-consistent study, this paper reports on preliminary discussions with groups of Māori, Pacific, and Afghan people in NZ, whose communities have been harmed by TB and TB stigma. Participants' discussions highlight key concerns and meanings that ought to inform the development of guidelines and a more robust consultative process for the governance of how TB isolate samples are collected and used both retrospectively and in future research. We argue for ethical processes to be culturally nuanced and community-generated, flexible and meaningful, and situated in relation to the physical and symbolic effects of TB. We discuss the significance of Indigenous data sovereignty, rights, and kāwanatanga (governorship) in shaping a multicultural data sovereignty model.

Indexed as

TuberculosisBiomedical ResearchCultural DiversityFemaleHumansMaleMaori PeopleNew ZealandPacific Island PeopleQualitative ResearchSocial StigmaSouth Asian PeopleIndigenous data sovereigntyIsolate samplesKaupapa Māori researchTuberculosis research

Identifiers

PMID38801628
PMCPMC11882608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.