Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38801620›Full record

ReviewProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2024

Probiotics for Aquaculture: Hope, Truth, and Reality.

Svetoslav Dimitrov Todorov, Joao Marcos Scafuro Lima, Jorge Enrique Vazquez Bucheli, Igor Vitalievich Popov, Santosh Kumar Tiwari, Michael Leonidas Chikindas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Beyond Probiotics: Postbiotics for Healthy Aquaculture.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. DietaryMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gut-Derived Lactic Acid Bacteria,International journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Svetoslav Dimitrov Todorov *ProBacLab, Laboratório de Microbiologia de Alimentos, Departamento de Alimentos e Nutrição Experimental, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-000, SP, Brazil. todorov@usp.br.
Joao Marcos Scafuro LimaProBacLab, Laboratório de Microbiologia de Alimentos, Departamento de Alimentos e Nutrição Experimental, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-000, SP, Brazil.
Jorge Enrique Vazquez BucheliFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Departamento de Bioestadistica y Genetica, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Av. Universidad 3000, C.P. 04510, Mexico City, Mexico.
Igor Vitalievich PopovCenter for Agrobiotechnology, Don State Technical University, Gagarina Sq., 1, Rostov-On-Don 344002, Rostov, Russia.
Santosh Kumar TiwariDepartment of Genetics, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak 124001, Haryana, India.
Michael Leonidas Chikindas *Center for Agrobiotechnology, Don State Technical University, Gagarina Sq., 1, Rostov-On-Don 344002, Rostov, Russia.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal UIDB/05937/2020 and UIDP/05937/2020Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation Project Number 075-15-2019-1880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of microorganisms as beneficial crops for human and animal health has been studied for decades, and these microorganisms have been in practical use for quite some time. Nowadays, in addition to well-known examples of beneficial properties of lactic acid bacteria, bifidobacteria, selected Bacillus spp., and yeasts, there are several other bacteria considered next-generation probiotics that have been proposed to improve host health. Aquaculture is a rapidly growing area that provides sustainable proteins for consumption by humans and other animals. Thus, there is a need to develop new technologies for the production practices associated with cleaner and environment-friendly approaches. It is a well-known fact that proper selection of the optimal probiotics for use in aquaculture is an essential step to ensure effectiveness and safety. In this critical review, we discuss the evaluation of host-specific probiotics in aquaculture, challenges in using probiotics in aquaculture, methods to improve the survival of probiotics under different environmental conditions, technological approach to improving storage, and delivery along with possible negative consequences of using probiotics in aquaculture. A critical analysis of the identified challenges for the use of beneficial microbes in aquaculture will help in sustainable aquafarming, leading to improved agricultural practices with a clear aim to increase protein production.

Indexed as

AquacultureProbioticsAnimalsHumansAntimicrobialsAquacultureAquatic environmentsProbioticsStability of probiotics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.