Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38801583›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2024

Monkeypox Diagnosis in Clinical Settings: A Comprehensive Review of Best Laboratory Practices.

Nityanand Jain, Tungki Pratama Umar, Reem Sayad, Muhammed Edib Mokresh, Kevin Tandarto, Reynold Siburian, Phey Liana, Sniedze Laivacuma, Aigars Reinis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nityanand JainFaculty of Medicine, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema Street 16, Riga, 1007, Latvia. nityapkl@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7918-7909
Tungki Pratama UmarFaculty of Medicine, Sriwijaya University, Dr. Mohammad Ali Street-RSMH Complex, Palembang, 30126, Indonesia. tungkipratama@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6975-8096
Reem SayadFaculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Saad Zaghloul, Assiut, 71515, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4378-2714
Muhammed Edib MokreshFaculty of International Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Tibbiye, Istanbul, 34668, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0239-5814
Kevin TandartoFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Pluit Raya Street No. 2, North Jakarta, Special Capital Region of Jakarta, 14440, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6998-8091
Reynold SiburianFaculty of Medicine, Sriwijaya University, Dr. Mohammad Ali Street-RSMH Complex, Palembang, 30126, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0317-4113
Phey LianaDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Sriwijaya University-Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital, Palembang, 30126, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2081-180X
Sniedze LaivacumaFaculty of Medicine, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema Street 16, Riga, 1007, Latvia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2325-6151
Aigars ReinisFaculty of Medicine, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema Street 16, Riga, 1007, Latvia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3671-1213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An outbreak of monkeypox (Mpox) was reported in more than 40 countries in early 2022. Accurate diagnosis of Mpox can be challenging, but history, clinical findings, and laboratory diagnosis can establish the diagnosis. The pre-analytic phase of testing includes collecting, storing, and transporting specimens. It is advised to swab the lesion site with virus transport medium (VTM) containing Dacron or polyester flock swabs from two different sites. Blood, urine, and semen samples may also be used. Timely sampling is necessary to obtain a sufficient amount of virus or antibodies. The analytical phase of infectious disease control involves diagnostic tools to determine the presence of the virus. While polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the gold standard for detecting Mpox, genome sequencing is for identifying new or modified viruses. As a complement to these methods, isothermal amplification methods have been designed. ELISA assays are also available for the determination of antibodies. Electron microscopy is another effective diagnostic method for tissue identification of the virus. Wastewater fingerprinting provides some of the most effective diagnostic methods for virus identification at the community level. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods are further discussed. Post-analytic phase requires proper interpretation of test results and the preparation of accurate patient reports that include relevant medical history, clinical guidelines, and recommendations for follow-up testing or treatment.

Indexed as

Mpox, MonkeypoxClinical Laboratory TechniquesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMonkeypox virusNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionSpecimen HandlingDiagnosticsImmunodiagnosticsLaboratoryMicroscopyMonkeypoxMpoxPCRSequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.