Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38801493›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2024

Ultra-diluted complex additive in the diet reveals benefits in the intestinal tract of nursery-phase piglets.

Gustavo Zigovski, Isabela Cristina Colaço Bez, Luís Fernando Costa Garrido, Caroline Cintra Rodrigues, Angela Cristina da Fonseca de Oliveira, Paulo Evaristo Rupolo, Liliana Bury de Azevedo, Elmer Modesto Elvir Hernandez, Jansller Luiz Genova, Saulo Henrique Weber and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gustavo ZigovskiSchool of Medicine and Life Sciences, Graduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, 80215-901, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1887-9810
Isabela Cristina Colaço BezSchool of Medicine and Life Sciences, Graduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, 80215-901, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4200-9401
Luís Fernando Costa GarridoSchool of Medicine and Life Sciences, Graduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, 80215-901, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5739-5280
Caroline Cintra RodriguesSchool of Medicine and Life Sciences, Graduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, 80215-901, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4193-1889
Angela Cristina da Fonseca de OliveiraSchool of Medicine and Life Sciences, Graduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, 80215-901, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0332-7087
Paulo Evaristo RupoloAnimal Science Department, State University of Western Paraná, 85960-000, Marechal Cândido Rondon, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1326-5967
Liliana Bury de AzevedoAnimal Science Department, State University of Western Paraná, 85960-000, Marechal Cândido Rondon, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6203-6274
Elmer Modesto Elvir HernandezSchool of Medicine and Life Sciences, Graduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, 80215-901, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1936-3801
Jansller Luiz GenovaAnimal Science Department, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, 36570-900, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8000-2166
Saulo Henrique WeberSchool of Medicine and Life Sciences, Graduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, 80215-901, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7584-8044
Paulo Levi de Oliveira CarvalhoAnimal Science Department, State University of Western Paraná, 85960-000, Marechal Cândido Rondon, PR, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9273-3209
Leandro Batista CostaSchool of Medicine and Life Sciences, Graduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, 80215-901, PR, Brazil. batista.leandro@pucpr.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1852-4860

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess an ultra-diluted (UD) complex, as a replacement for an antimicrobial growth promoter in diets, on growth performance, intestinal health, and inflammatory response of nursery piglets. The experiment lasted 37 days and involved 126 animals weaned at 21 ± 1.3 d, with an initial body weight of 5.62 ± 1.16 kg. Piglets were assigned to six dietary treatments in a randomized block design with seven replicates and three piglets per pen as experimental unit. The treatments were: positive control (PC)- basal diet + 120 mg/kg of chlorohydroxyquinoline; negative control (NC)- basal diet without additives; and NC containing 4.5; 6.0; 7.5 or 9.0 kg of UD additive/ton diet. Performance data were calculated, and daily diarrhea was observed. Blood samples were collected for hematological analysis. At the end of the experiment, one animal per pen was slaughtered for organ weighing, pH, and the collection of intestinal samples for histopathology. Feces and cecal contents were collected for microbiological and antibiogram analyses. There was no difference in the performance between the treatments. Throughout the study, UD levels were equal to those of PC for diarrhea occurrence. Higher levels of UD complex led to higher total leukocyte counts. The 4.5 treatment showed a reduction in total and thermotolerant Enterobacteriaceae populations in piglet feces and an increase in lactic acid bacteria compared to PC. All treatments resulted in fewer duodenal histopathological alterations than those in the NC group. The use of UD additives, especially at 4.5 kg/ton, is a good alternative to chlorohydroxyquinoline in piglet diets.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietAnimalsDiarrheaDietary SupplementsIntestinesRandom AllocationSus scrofaSwineSwine DiseasesBacterial resistanceDiarrheaGut HealthMicrobiologyNutritionPigs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.