SynthesisJournal of neurology2024
Loss of the "swallow tail sign" on susceptibility-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The swallow tail sign: mechanisms, neuroimaging advances and future perspectives.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Towards a Multidimensional Model of Neurocognitive Disorders (MOND Model): Integrating Evidence from a Critical Review into a Model for Future Research.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Isolated auditory hallucinations as the initial neuropsychiatric manifestation of dementia with Lewy bodies: diagnostic pathway and individualized therapy (a case report).Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Characterization of cortical volume and whole-brain functional connectivity in Parkinson's disease patients: a MRI study combined with physiological aging brain changes.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLoss of dorsolateral nigral hyperintensity (DNH) on iron-sensitive brain MRI is useful for Parkinson's disease detection. DNH loss could also be of diagnostic value in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), an a-synuclein-related pathology. We aim to quantitatively synthesize evidence, investigating the role of MRI, a first-line imaging modality, in early DLB detection and differentiation from other dementias.
methodsOur study was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched using the terms like "dementia with Lewy bodies", "dorsolateral nigral hyperintensity", and "MRI". Only English-written peer-reviewed diagnostic accuracy studies were included. We used QUADAS-2 for quality assessment.
resultsOur search yielded 363 search results. Three studies were eligible, all with satisfying, high quality. The total population of 227 patients included 63 with DLB and 164 with other diseases (Alzheimer disease, frontotemporal dementia, mild cognitive impairment). Using a univariate random-effects logistic regression model, our meta-analysis resulted in pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR of 0.82 [0.62; 0.92], 0.79 [0.70; 0.86] and 16.26 ([3.3276; 79.4702], p = 0.0006), respectively, for scans with mixed field strength (1.5 and 3 T). Subgroup analysis of 3 T scans showed pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR of 0.82 [0.61; 0.93], 0.82 [0.72; 0.89] and 18.36 ([4.24; 79.46], p < 0.0001), respectively. DISCUSSION: DNH loss on iron-sensitive MRI might comprise a supportive biomarker for DLB detection, that could augment the value of the DLB diagnostic criteria. Further evaluation using standardized protocols is needed, as well as direct comparison to other supportive and indicative biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38801432What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.