Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38801204›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

Impact of scatter radiation on spectral quantification performance of first- and second-generation dual-layer spectral computed tomography.

Edgar Salazar, Leening P Liu, Amy E Perkins, Sandra S Halliburton, Nadav Shapira, Harold I Litt, Peter B Noël

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edgar SalazarDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Leening P LiuDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Amy E PerkinsPhilips Healthcare, Orange Village, Ohio, USA.
Sandra S HalliburtonPhilips Healthcare, Orange Village, Ohio, USA.
Nadav ShapiraDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Harold I LittDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Peter B NoëlDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Patient-specific, high-sensitivity spectral CT for assessment of pancreatic cancerR01EB030494 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GANG, JIANAN GRACE, NOËL, PETER B · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030494NIH HHS R01EB030494Philips Healthcare
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the impact of scatter radiation on quantitative performance of first and second-generation dual-layer spectral computed tomography (DLCT) systems.

methodA phantom with two iodine inserts (1 and 2 mg/mL) configured to intentionally introduce high scattering conditions was scanned with a first- and second-generation DLCT. Collimation widths (maximum of 4 cm for first generation and 8 cm for second generation) and radiation dose levels were varied. To evaluate the performance of both systems, the mean CT numbers of virtual monoenergetic images (MonoEs) at different energies were calculated and compared to expected values. MonoEs at 50  versus 150 keV were plotted to assess material characterization of both DLCTs. Additionally, iodine concentrations were determined, plotted, and compared against expected values. For each experimental scenario, absolute errors were reported.

resultsAn experimental setup, including a phantom design, was successfully implemented to simulate high scatter radiation imaging conditions. Both CT scanners illustrated high spectral accuracy for small collimation widths (1 and 2 cm). With increased collimation (4 cm), the second-generation DLCT outperformed the earlier DLCT system. Further, the spectral performance of the second-generation DLCT at an 8 cm collimation width was comparable to a 4 cm collimation on the first-generation DLCT. A comparison of the absolute errors between both systems at lower energy MonoEs illustrates that, for the same acquisition parameters, the second-generation DLCT generated results with decreased errors. Similarly, the maximum error in iodine quantification was less with second-generation DLCT (0.45  and 0.33 mg/mL for the first and second-generation DLCT, respectively).

conclusionThe implementation of a two-dimensional anti-scatter grid in the second-generation DLCT improves the spectral quantification performance. In the clinical routine, this improvement may enable additional clinical benefits, for example, in lung imaging.

Indexed as

Scattering, RadiationTomography, X-Ray ComputedLungPhantoms, ImagingCompton scattering artifactsdual‐layer spectral CTquantitative CTspectral computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID38801204
PMCPMC11244683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.