Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38800945›Full record

Observational studyEpilepsia open2024

Treatment simplification to optimize cenobamate effectiveness and tolerability: A real-world retrospective study in Spain.

Juan Jesús Rodríguez-Uranga, Juan María Sánchez-Caro, Roshan Hariramani Ramchandani

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Epilepsia open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cenobamate: An Appraisal Five Years On.Neurology and therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cenobamate reduces epileptiform activity in theFrontiers in neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  17. Cenobamate for Difficult-to-Treat Epilepsy - Selected Case Vignettes.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juan Jesús Rodríguez-UrangaCentro de Neurología Avanzada, Unidad de Epilepsia, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5354-1256
Juan María Sánchez-CaroCentro de Neurología Avanzada, Unidad de Epilepsia, Sevilla, Spain.
Roshan Hariramani RamchandaniCentro de Neurología Avanzada, Unidad de Epilepsia, Sevilla, Spain.

Funding

Angelini Pharma
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to explore the impact of co-antiseizure medication (co-ASM) optimization on the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate (CNB) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in a real-world setting.

methodsThis unicentric, retrospective, observational study included adults with focal-onset seizures who had received ≥2 previous ASMs. The main effectiveness endpoints included responder rates and seizure frequency reduction at 3, 6, and 12-month visits. The number of co-ASMs and defined daily dose (DDD) were analyzed at every visit. Safety endpoints included adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

resultsThirty-four patients with a median epilepsy duration of 22 years and a median of 15.5 seizures/month were analyzed. The median number of prior ASMs was 12, and the mean number of co-ASMs was 2.9 (SD 1). There was a reduction in seizure frequency/month from baseline to the last visit (p < 0.0001). Between baseline and the end of the study, the mean number of co-ASMs in the per-protocol (PP) population was reduced from 2.9 to 1.6 (p < 0.0001), and DDD was reduced from 3.6 to 1.4 (p < 0.0001). Sodium channel blockers (carbamazepine and lacosamide) and GABAergic drugs (clobazam) were the agents with the most significant reductions in DDD after 12 months. The percentage of patients in the PP population with ≥3 co-ASMs was reduced from 61.8% at baseline to 14.3% at 12 months; 1 patient was receiving CNB as monotherapy at the last visit. At the last visit, 85.7% of the PP population were ≥50% responders, and 33.3% were seizure-free. The percentage of patients with ADRs in the PP population was 71.9% at 3 months and 52.3% at 12 months. SIGNIFICANCE: Following rational polytherapy, optimization of co-ASM management during CNB treatment allowed high seizure freedom rates despite meaningful reductions in co-medication, while also achieving both good tolerability and patient satisfaction scores in a highly drug-resistant population. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Many patients with epilepsy still have seizures, even after being treated with several different epilepsy drugs. In this study of 34 patients from a Spanish clinic, we show that the epilepsy drug cenobamate can reduce the number of seizures in these patients, even after many other epilepsy drugs have failed. We also show that patients treated with cenobamate can reduce the dose or even stop taking certain other epilepsy drugs. This allows them to simplify their treatment and reduce adverse effects while still keeping control of their epilepsy.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsCarbamatesChlorophenolsDrug Resistant EpilepsyDrug Therapy, CombinationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSpainTetrazolesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnticonvulsantsCarbamatesCenobamateChlorophenolsTetrazolesantiseizure medicationcenobamatefocal epilepsyrefractoryseizure freedom

Identifiers

PMID38800945
PMCPMC11296129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.