Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38800861›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2024

Accuracy of orthodontic movements with 3D printed aligners: A prospective observational pilot study.

Marco Migliorati, Sara Drago, Tommaso Castroflorio, Paolo Pesce, Giovanni Battista, Alessandra Campobasso, Giorgio Gastaldi, Filippo Forin Valvecchi, Anna De Mari

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07496892 (Assessment of the Accuracy of Tooth Movement of 3D Printed Versus Thermoformed Aligners in Patients With Lower Anterior Crowding), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07496892 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of the Accuracy of Tooth Movement of 3D Printed Versus Thermoformed Aligners in Patients With Lower Anterior Crowding: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled28ConditionsLower Anterior CrowdingArms3d printed aligner, thermoformed aligner
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. READER'S FORUM.Korean journal of orthodontics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Accuracy of orthodontic movement with nocturnal three-dimensionally printed and thermoformed aligners : Retrospective cohort study comparing two different treatments protocols.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marco MiglioratiDepartment of Digital Orthodontics, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8671-3025
Sara DragoDepartment of Digital Orthodontics, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9897-8079
Tommaso CastroflorioPrivate Practice, Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5675-3234
Paolo PesceDepartment of Digital Orthodontics, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8726-4145
Giovanni BattistaPrivate Practice, Foggia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3543-686X
Alessandra CampobassoDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4726-8816
Giorgio GastaldiDepartment of Orthodontic, Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6285-1404
Filippo Forin ValvecchiDepartment of Orthodontic, Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2034-4292
Anna De MariDepartment of Orthodontic, Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8877-171X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Owing to the availability of 3D software, scanners, and printers, clinicians are encouraged to produce in-office aligners. Recently, a new directprinting resin (Tera Harz TC-85DAC) has been introduced. Studies on its mechanical characteristics and biological effects have been published; however, evidence on its efficacy in orthodontic treatment remains scarce. This pilot study aimed to investigate the accuracy of teeth movement achieved with directprinted aligners. Methods: Seventeen patients (eight males and nine females) with a mean age of 27.67 ± 8.95 years, presenting with dental rotations < 30° and spaces/crowding < 5 mm, were recruited for this study. The teeth movement was planned starting from a T0 digital dental cast. The 3D direct-printed aligners were produced using Tera Harz TC-85DAC resin. Once the orthodontic treatment was completed, a final digital cast was obtained (T1). The planned teeth positions were then superimposed onto the T0 and T1 digital models. The differences between the programmed movements and the achieved overall torque, tip, rotation, and transverse dimensions were assessed using the paired t test or Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Results: The overall accuracies for torque, tip, and rotation were 67.6%, 64.2%, and 72.0%, respectively. The accuracy of the change in transverse diameter was 99.6%. Conclusions: Within the limits of the present pilot study (difficulties with abnormally shaped teeth and use of attachments), it can be concluded that 3D printed aligners can be successfully printed in-house and utilized for mildly crowded cases, with a comparable accuracy of tooth movement to that of other aligners.

Indexed as

3D printed alignersIn office alignersResinTooth movement

Identifiers

PMID38800861
PMCPMC11129935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.