Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38800806›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2024

The application of natural language processing for the extraction of mechanistic information in toxicology.

Marie Corradi, Thomas Luechtefeld, Alyanne M de Haan, Raymond Pieters, Jonathan H Freedman, Tamara Vanhaecke, Mathieu Vinken, Marc Teunis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marie CorradiInnovative Testing in Life Sciences and Chemistry, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Thomas LuechtefeldToxTrack, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Alyanne M de HaanInnovative Testing in Life Sciences and Chemistry, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Raymond PietersInnovative Testing in Life Sciences and Chemistry, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Jonathan H FreedmanGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Tamara VanhaeckeDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel-Belgium, Brussels, Belgium.
Mathieu VinkenDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel-Belgium, Brussels, Belgium.
Marc TeunisInnovative Testing in Life Sciences and Chemistry, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To study the ways in which compounds can induce adverse effects, toxicologists have been constructing Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs). An AOP can be considered as a pragmatic tool to capture and visualize mechanisms underlying different types of toxicity inflicted by any kind of stressor, and describes the interactions between key entities that lead to the adverse outcome on multiple biological levels of organization. The construction or optimization of an AOP is a labor intensive process, which currently depends on the manual search, collection, reviewing and synthesis of available scientific literature. This process could however be largely facilitated using Natural Language Processing (NLP) to extract information contained in scientific literature in a systematic, objective, and rapid manner that would lead to greater accuracy and reproducibility. This would support researchers to invest their expertise in the substantive assessment of the AOPs by replacing the time spent on evidence gathering by a critical review of the data extracted by NLP. As case examples, we selected two frequent adversities observed in the liver: namely, cholestasis and steatosis denoting accumulation of bile and lipid, respectively. We used deep learning language models to recognize entities of interest in text and establish causal relationships between them. We demonstrate how an NLP pipeline combining Named Entity Recognition and a simple rules-based relationship extraction model helps screen compounds related to liver adversities in the literature, but also extract mechanistic information for how such adversities develop, from the molecular to the organismal level. Finally, we provide some perspectives opened by the recent progress in Large Language Models and how these could be used in the future. We propose this work brings two main contributions: 1) a proof-of-concept that NLP can support the extraction of information from text for modern toxicology and 2) a template open-source model for recognition of toxicological entities and extraction of their relationships. All resources are openly accessible via GitHub (https://github.com/ontox-project/en-tox).

Indexed as

adverse outcome pathwaymachine learningnatural language processingopen sciencerisk assessmenttoxicology

Identifiers

PMID38800806
PMCPMC11116573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.