Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38800772›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Efficacy of Oxy-Ionic Solutions With Varying pH Levels Against Streptococcus mutans In Vitro.

Xu Ming, Rozita Hassan, Suharni Mohamad, Wan Nazatul Shima Shahidan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xu MingOrthodontic Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, MYS.
Rozita HassanOrthodontic Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, MYS.
Suharni MohamadMolecular Biology Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, MYS.
Wan Nazatul Shima ShahidanPharmacology Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, MYS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Chlorhexidine (CHX) is a widely used antimicrobial agent known for its ability to inhibit cariogenic bacteria, reduce plaque formation, neutralize acidity, and promote remineralization. However, the effectiveness of oxy-ionic solutions at different pH levels as an alternative antimicrobial treatment requires further exploration. This study aims to compare the antimicrobial effects of oxy-ionic solutions at various pH levels with those of CHX and fluoride. Methodology This study employed disc diffusion tests to measure the inhibition zone diameters of each solution and broth dilution assays to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). Results The oxy-ionic solutions exhibited varying degrees of antimicrobial effectiveness depending on their pH levels. The solution at pH 5 demonstrated the best antimicrobial performance among the oxy-ionic solutions, with inhibition zones comparable to those of CHX. The MIC and MBC values indicated that oxy-ionic solutions in mildly acidic environments generally resulted in better antimicrobial activity. Conclusions The study concludes that while CHX remains highly effective against cariogenic bacteria, oxy-ionic solutions, particularly at pH 5, offer a promising alternative. The antimicrobial efficacy of oxy-ionic solutions is influenced by their pH levels. Further research is recommended to explore the long-term effects and clinical applications of oxy-ionic solutions in maintaining oral health and preventing disease.

Indexed as

antimicrobialdental cariesmouthwashoxidizing solutionstreptococcus mutans

Identifiers

PMID38800772
PMCPMC11126541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.