ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
Evaluation of a real-time PCR assay performance to detect
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of three commercial real-time PCR kits for direct detection ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Utilizing RT-PCR for infectious disease diagnosis with emphasis on non-tuberculous mycobacteria in Bangladesh, 2019-2024.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Assessment of post-pandemic NAAT-based diagnostic capacity among laboratories with COVID-19 testing resource investments in Indonesia.PloS one · 2026Article
- pHEAA/pMA-DNA Hydrogel Sensing Platform for Detecting Drug-Resistant Gene Variants inACS measurement science au · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the major global health issues due to its high mortality rate, especially in low- and middle-income countries. One of the key success points of the TB eradication program is early TB diagnosis, which requires rapid and accurate diagnostic testing. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a newly developed RT-PCR kit (Indigen MTB/DR-TB RT-PCR) in a routine TB clinical setting. Method: A multi-fluorescence RT-PCR assay was designed and developed to detect regions within Result: The performance of Indigen MTB/DR-TB RT-PCR to detect MTB was assessed using 610 sputum specimens obtained from suspected patients. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 94.12% (95% CI: 90.86-96.48%) and 98.32% (95% CI: 96.20-99.46%), respectively. When the analysis was performed on AFB smear-negative TB subjects (386 subjects), a lower sensitivity level was found at 78.57% (95% CI: 68.26-86.78%), while the specificity level remained similar at 98.34% (95% CI: 96.18-99.46%). The overall performance of Indigen MTB/DR-TB RT-PCR to detect MTB showed substantial agreement with the MTB culture method (kappa value 0.93). In comparison to DST, the sensitivity and specificity levels of Indigen to detect RIF resistance or INH resistance were 78.2% (95% CI: 61.8-90.2%) and 82.8% (95% CI: 64.2-94.2%), respectively, while the specificity level for both groups was at 100% (95% CI, 87.7-100%). Conclusion: Indigen MTB/DR-TB RT-PCR demonstrated reliable performance for TB molecular diagnostic testing and can be implemented in routine TB diagnostic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.