Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38800754›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024

Microbial community response to hydrocarbon exposure in iron oxide mats: an environmental study.

Chequita N Brooks, Erin K Field

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chequita N BrooksDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.
Erin K FieldDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrocarbon pollution is a widespread issue in both groundwater and surface-water systems; however, research on remediation at the interface of these two systems is limited. This interface is the oxic-anoxic boundary, where hydrocarbon pollutant from contaminated groundwaters flows into surface waters and iron mats are formed by microaerophilic iron-oxidizing bacteria. Iron mats are highly chemically adsorptive and host a diverse community of microbes. To elucidate the effect of hydrocarbon exposure on iron mat geochemistry and microbial community structure and function, we sampled iron mats both upstream and downstream from a leaking underground storage tank. Hydrocarbon-exposed iron mats had significantly higher concentrations of oxidized iron and significantly lower dissolved organic carbon and total dissolved phosphate than unexposed iron mats. A strong negative correlation between dissolved phosphate and benzene was observed in the hydrocarbon-exposed iron mats and water samples. There were positive correlations between iron and other hydrocarbons with benzene in the hydrocarbon-exposed iron mats, which was unique from water samples. The hydrocarbon-exposed iron mats represented two types, flocculent and seep, which had significantly different concentrations of iron, hydrocarbons, and phosphate, indicating that iron mat is also an important context in studies of freshwater mats. Using constrained ordination, we found the best predictors for community structure to be dissolved oxygen, pH, and benzene. Alpha diversity and evenness were significantly lower in hydrocarbon-exposed iron mats than unexposed mats. Using 16S rDNA amplicon sequences, we found evidence of three putative nitrate-reducing iron-oxidizing taxa in microaerophile-dominated iron mats (

Indexed as

biogeochemistryhydrocarbonsiron matiron-oxidizing bacteriamicrobial community

Identifiers

PMID38800754
PMCPMC11116660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.