ArticleBioactive materials2024
Dynamic microphysiological system chip platform for high-throughput, customizable, and multi-dimensional drug screening.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Advances and challenges in research methods on oral absorption mechanisms of nano-formulations.PeerJ · 2025Pooled it
- Advancing lung organoids toward clinical applications: a global perspective on research focus and future directions.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Recent advances in immunocompetent human skin-on-chip models: Construction strategies and biomedical applications.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Development of a Multi-Organ Microphysiological (MPS) Model to Study Age-Related Comorbidities.Advanced biology · 2026Article
- Advances and applications of brain organoids in central nervous system disorders: Bridging the gap from laboratory to clinic.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- [Standardized Construction of Lung Cancer Organoids and Their Application Progress in the Precise Treatment of Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
- Organ-on-a-chip toxicology.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026Review
- Deciphering inter-organ communication: The multi-organ-bone axis in osteoporosis and emerging therapeutic strategies.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Human iPSCs: atrial versus ventricular cardiomyocytes and their functional and pharmacological differences.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026Review
- Innovations in skin microphysiological systems for nonclinical testing and FDA modernization.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Review
- Bridging the Gap Between Static Histology and Dynamic Organ-on-a-Chip Models.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026Review
- Stem Cell Models for Elucidating Cellular Mechanisms of Substance Use Disorders and Advancing Addiction Pharmacology.Stem cells international · 2026Review
- 3D Cardiac Constructs in Drug Discovery: Current Advances and Future Challenges.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Synovium-On-A-Chip: Simulating the Microenvironment of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovium via Multicell Interactions to Target Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- In vitro biomimetic models for respiratory diseases: progress in lung organoids and lung-on-a-chip.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Liver-Skin Microphysiological System for Evaluating Topical Drug Delivery-Induced Liver Injury.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Advances and applications of gut organoids: modeling intestinal diseases and therapeutic development.Life medicine · 2025Review
- Engineering cardiology with miniature hearts.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Advances in cardiac organoid research: implications for cardiovascular disease treatment.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Review
- Capacity and limitations of microfluidic flow to increase solute transport in three-dimensional cell cultures.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spheroids and organoids have attracted significant attention as innovative models for disease modeling and drug screening. By employing diverse types of spheroids or organoids, it is feasible to establish microphysiological systems that enhance the precision of disease modeling and offer more dependable and comprehensive drug screening. High-throughput microphysiological systems that support optional, parallel testing of multiple drugs have promising applications in personalized medical treatment and drug research. However, establishing such a system is highly challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach. This study introduces a dynamic Microphysiological System Chip Platform (MSCP) with multiple functional microstructures that encompass the mentioned advantages. We developed a high-throughput lung cancer spheroids model and an intestine-liver-heart-lung cancer microphysiological system for conducting parallel testing on four anti-lung cancer drugs, demonstrating the feasibility of the MSCP. This microphysiological system combines microscale and macroscale biomimetics to enable a comprehensive assessment of drug efficacy and side effects. Moreover, the microphysiological system enables evaluation of the real pharmacological effect of drug molecules reaching the target lesion after absorption by normal organs through fluid-based physiological communication. The MSCP could serves as a valuable platform for microphysiological system research, making significant contributions to disease modeling, drug development, and personalized medical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.