Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38800712›Full record

ArticleForensic science international. Synergy2024

Technology use among the nation's medical examiner and coroner offices: Data from the 2018 Census of Medical Examiner and Coroner Offices.

Liat C Weinstein, Kelly A Keyes, Connor Brooks, Micaela A Ascolese, Hope M Smiley-McDonald, Jeri D Ropero-Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic science management, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liat C WeinsteinRTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Kelly A KeyesRTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Connor BrooksBureau of Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20531, USA.
Micaela A AscoleseRTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Hope M Smiley-McDonaldRTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Jeri D Ropero-MillerRTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technology uses among medical examiner and coroner (MEC) offices in the United States are not well characterized, yet technology is essential to job-performing duties. Resources, operational infrastructure, and MECs' policies and procedures that affect technology use should be better understood. MEC offices need access to technologies like internet, case management systems (CMSs), databases, and advanced imaging to perform their basic duties. A current state of the technologies MEC offices use to complete a death investigation is presented by analyzing data from the 2018 Census of Medical Examiner and Coroner Offices. This analysis shows the New England division reported the most internet and CMS access. Many offices reported limited access to, and low participation in, databases for assessing and sharing case data. Offices serving populations >250,000 have more access to the internet, CMSs, databases, and advanced imaging. Although MEC office technology use has improved over time, it is still disparate.

Indexed as

Advanced imagingCase management systemMedical examiner and coronerMedicolegal death investigationOnline databasesTechnology use

Identifiers

PMID38800712
PMCPMC11127145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.