ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Limited capability of MRI radiomics to predict primary tumor histology of brain metastases in external validation.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor morphology on CT radiomics is largely driven by the local anatomical environment, not the primary tumor type.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Diagnostic, Therapeutic, and Prognostic Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Clinical Management of Brain Metastases (BMs).Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Growing research demonstrates the ability to predict histology or genetic information of various malignancies using radiomic features extracted from imaging data. This study aimed to investigate MRI-based radiomics in predicting the primary tumor of brain metastases through internal and external validation, using oversampling techniques to address the class imbalance. Methods: This IRB-approved retrospective multicenter study included brain metastases from lung cancer, melanoma, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and a combined heterogenous group of other primary entities (5-class classification). Local data were acquired between 2003 and 2021 from 231 patients (545 metastases). External validation was performed with 82 patients (280 metastases) and 258 patients (809 metastases) from the publicly available Stanford BrainMetShare and the University of California San Francisco Brain Metastases Stereotactic Radiosurgery datasets, respectively. Preprocessing included brain extraction, bias correction, coregistration, intensity normalization, and semi-manual binary tumor segmentation. Two-thousand five hundred and twenty-eight radiomic features were extracted from T1w (± contrast), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and wavelet transforms for each sequence (8 decompositions). Random forest classifiers were trained with selected features on original and oversampled data (5-fold cross-validation) and evaluated on internal/external holdout test sets using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Oversampling did not improve the overall unsatisfactory performance on the internal and external test sets. Incorrect data partitioning (oversampling before train/validation/test split) leads to a massive overestimation of model performance. Conclusions: Radiomics models' capability to predict histologic or genomic data from imaging should be critically assessed; external validation is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.