ReviewNeuro-oncology advances
Genomic ascertainment of primary central nervous system cancers in adolescents and young adults.
Review in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Re-envisioning genetic predisposition to childhood and adolescent cancers.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic ascertainment is the inversion of the traditional phenotype-first approach; with a "genome-first" approach, a cohort linked to electronic health records (EHR) undergoes germline sequencing (array, panel, exome, and genome) and deleterious variation of interest in a gene (or set of genes) are identified. Phenotype is then queried from the linked EHR and from call-back investigation and estimates of variant prevalence, disease penetrance, and phenotype can be determined. This should permit a better estimate of the full phenotypic spectrum, severity, and penetrance linked to a deleterious variant. For now, given the modest size, limited EHR, and age of participants in sequenced cohorts, genomic ascertainment approaches to investigate cancer in children and young adults will likely be restricted to descriptive studies and complement traditional phenotype-first work. Another issue is the ascertainment of the cohort itself: Participants need to survive long enough to enroll. Not accounting for this may lead to bias and incorrect estimates of variant prevalence. Adult-focused cohorts with EHR extending back into childhood, linked to cancer registries, and/or studies that permit recontact with participants may facilitate genomic ascertainment in pediatric cancer research. In summary, genomic ascertainment in pediatric primary brain cancer research remains largely untapped and merits further investigation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.