ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
Computational modeling for deciphering tissue microenvironment heterogeneity from spatially resolved transcriptomics.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconstructing Coherent Functional Landscape From Multi-Modal Multi-Slice Spatial Transcriptomics by a Variational Spatial Gaussian Process.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal analysis of Crohn's disease reveals PECAM2 signaling at the basis of the inflammation-to-fibrosis transition.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2025Article
- Spatially informed graph transformers for spatially resolved transcriptomics.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Pan-cancer single-cell transcriptomic analysis reveals CD83 as a hallmark of tumor-associated neutrophils with senescent and pro-tumor properties.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Demystifying the black box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in bioinformatics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Spatially aligned graph transfer learning for characterizing spatial regulatory heterogeneity.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics techniques, while measuring gene expression, retain spatial location information, aiding in situ studies of organismal tissue architecture and the progression of pathological processes. These techniques generate vast amounts of omics data, necessitating the development of computational methods to reveal the underlying tissue microenvironment heterogeneity. The main directions in spatial transcriptomics data analysis are spatial domain detection and spatial deconvolution, which can identify spatial functional regions and parse the distribution of cell types in spatial transcriptomics data by integrating single-cell transcriptomics data. In these two research directions, many computational methods have been successively proposed. This article will categorize them into three types: machine learning-based methods, probabilistic models-based methods, and deep learning-based methods. It will list and discuss the representative algorithms of each type along with their advantages and disadvantages and describe the datasets and evaluation metrics used to assess these computational methods, facilitating researchers in selecting suitable computational methods according to their research needs. Finally, combining the latest technological developments and the advantages and disadvantages of current algorithms, this article will look forward to the future directions of computational method development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.